Photo of a helicopter at full zoom.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Photo of a helicopter at full zoom.

Postby Tommo on Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:42 pm

Hi guys,

I've recently purchased a D70 with a Tamron 70-300 lens.

Anyway, saw a heli in the sky tonight, so I grabbed a shot on auto mode. This shot was taken in LARGE JPEG, FINE mode, at full extension of the zoom. I have cropped the photo to make it of just the helicopter, and was suprised by the lack of quality. ISO was at 200.

Is this because it's a cheap lens, or is it supposed to be like this when cropped? It's cropped down to about 1/3 of the original size. Not sure if this is normal or not :)

Image

Thanks,
Tommo.
User avatar
Tommo
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia.

Postby Glen on Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:50 pm

Tommo, you had the lens at 250mm, probably needed a tripod or monopod at that focal length, though you were at a fast speed (1/2000). I don't have this lens but maybe stopping down to f8-f11 range might help. Maybe a better quality lens would help. Maybe all of the above, but stopping down (reducing the aperture ie bigger number) usually helps. This was shot at f5.6 which I assume is wide open on that lens.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby johndec on Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:11 pm

I think what Glen was trying to say (I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong and I'll happily bow to his superier knowledge), is that most lenses tend to be a little bit "soft" at maximum aperture. In the case of this photo, if you'd used a smaller aperture, even though that would have meant a slower shutter speed, the image would have been much sharper. however a slower shutter speed would have blurred the helicopter blades, which I think would have actually enhanced the image and given it a sense of movement.

After you've experimented with the Tamron a bit, I think you will be very happy with it. I've got one myself and have taken (what I think!!) are some very nice pics with it. I just haven't got around to organising a site to host them yet :) I've taken some very sharp and heavily cropped pics of planes taking off and landing with the Tamron.

No doubt they'll be picked to pieces when I post them :lol:
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby Nnnnsic on Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:57 am

I'd agree. Whilst I have no experience with the quality of Tamron lenses, the f stop setting is the likely culprit. At 1/2000, you can easily sacrifice some shutter speed for a higher f stop setting.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Glen on Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:21 am

Johndec, Nnnnsic, spot on
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby mudder on Thu Dec 23, 2004 7:56 am

G'day Tommo,
I don't have much learned advice on the pic other than to back up the comment re: blurred blades would have given more of a sense of motion etc., but welcome to the club!

Cheers mate,
Mudder
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby JordanP on Thu Dec 23, 2004 9:16 am

I'd agree with all the above, but I'd also add that you wouldn't be able to control the f stop or shutter speed in Auto mode. You would have to use perhaps Aperture Priority or Manual - the shot sees a tad underexposed also as the Auto mode would have been trying to expose for the sky.
Underexposed shots tend to be alot worse with noise & general pic quality

:) Time is often restricted for such a shot as the one you captured but if you could, I would switch to manual and spot meter off the helicopter itself (this would be overexposing the sky but the heli would perfect).

I love helicopters - I think its a nice shot anyway

Cheers,
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby Tommo on Thu Dec 23, 2004 9:35 am

Hi D70users,

Thanks very much for all the responses so far, i'm learning much more already :) I'll head on out to the airport over the next couple of days, and trying raising my focal setting from 5.6 to 8 - 11, and see how I perform. :)

JordanP:- I'm a bit confused by what you mean about exposing the sky and heliopter. How exactly do I spot meter the heli itself? I notice on auto mode, the camera always focused on the centre block, which was on the heli itself.

Thanks again,
Tommo.
User avatar
Tommo
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia.

Postby JordanP on Thu Dec 23, 2004 9:49 am

Hi, yep sorry I was bit confusing. Your focus would have been fine, but your metering is a different thing. If you look at the D70 forum logo above left you will see a square box with just a dot in the center of it. That is your metering ... the logo is set to spot.

Its roll is to read the light coming from your subject and give you a reading to allow you to set the exposure on your camera. When you are on auto the exposure is set by the camera (not by you) and is based on the information gathered by your metering method.

I don't have my camera here at the moment so other members may be able to tell you which button to push to change the settings.

:lol: After reading what I just wrote I'm not sure I have made anything much clearer. Hope it helps anyways.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby gstark on Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:01 am

Hi Tommo, and welcome.

Tommo wrote:JordanP:- I'm a bit confused by what you mean about exposing the sky and heliopter. How exactly do I spot meter the heli itself? I notice on auto mode, the camera always focused on the centre block, which was on the heli itself.


Try pointing your camera at a clear blue sky and taking a reading, then point it at the road or a footpath, and take a reading ... note the differences ... A cloudy sky will yield different results again.

In auto mode, the camera will be defaulting to matrix metering. While it's focussing in the centre - in this case that's what you want - it's metering on the basis of the full frame, which includes a lot of (bright) sky. That's goig to distort the results, which is not what you want. :)

The meter reacts to all of this apparent brightness and reduces your exposure accordingly.

If you switch from Auto to A, then change your metering from matrix to spot, your metering will only be based upon the central area (focussed area, actually) and only just a very small region of that area. That will give you a very different EV reading from one that includes a vast expanse of sky.

Traps to watch out for: are you photographing the shaded, or illuminated, side of the helicopter? What about its colour? A white helicopter will yield different results from one painted in navy grey. Red should be similar to grey, but a navy blue of black chopper will present similar exposure issues to those presented by a white one.

Ok ... that deals with exposure.

To me the image looks soft; as others have suggested, stopping down the lens a stop or three should bring you into the lens's sweet spot, and you should see a marked improvement in accuity. If you don't, and the lens is new enough, I'd be contemplating a chat with the vendors.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22901
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Tommo on Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:14 pm

Thanks for that clarification :) I will try all suggestions next time I see something like that, and let you know how I go :!:

Thanks ALL for your help - this forum is a fantastic resource 8)

Regards,
Tommo.
User avatar
Tommo
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests