Hubble Space Telescope images

Forum rules and nettiquette, along with other items of general interest.

Important information about this forum is contained here, and members MUST familiarise themselves with the posts here, as well as what is contained within the FAQ.

Please do not complain if you ask a question regarding a topic covered here or in the FAQ and in response you get a rather brusque, obtuse or sarcastic response. We get sick and tired of answering the same questions, day in, day out, when the answers are clearly published, in plain view, and all that is required is for you to open your eyes and read them!

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Hubble Space Telescope images

Postby Killakoala on Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:50 pm

Anyone want to print their own HST images?

Then this website is for you. It has full size TIF and JPG images taken with the Hubble Space Telescope.

The detail of the images when viewed at full size is quite remarkable.

http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/index.html
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Yi-P on Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:07 pm

Simply amazing photographs they have there!!! :shock:
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby adam on Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:49 am

Amazing!!!

I wonder what they'll get when they point it at earth :D *waves at the sky*
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby Killakoala on Mon Jul 02, 2007 7:51 am

adam wrote:Amazing!!!

I wonder what they'll get when they point it at earth :D *waves at the sky*


Google Earth :)

Apparently the field of view of the Hubble is one tenth that of the moon. Now that is some telephoto. ;)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby markjd on Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:23 am

Thanks for the link. Some good desktop wallpaper material :)


Mark
markjd
Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 2:56 pm
Location: Moonee Ponds, Victoria

Postby Yi-P on Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:40 pm

Killakoala wrote:
adam wrote:Amazing!!!

I wonder what they'll get when they point it at earth :D *waves at the sky*


Google Earth :)

Apparently the field of view of the Hubble is one tenth that of the moon. Now that is some telephoto. ;)


That is also the biggest lens ever built I believe.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Gordon on Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:07 pm

Yi-P wrote:
Killakoala wrote:
adam wrote:Amazing!!!

I wonder what they'll get when they point it at earth :D *waves at the sky*


Google Earth :)

Apparently the field of view of the Hubble is one tenth that of the moon. Now that is some telephoto. ;)


That is also the biggest lens ever built I believe.


Not the biggest lens for so many reasons... firstly and most importantly, its a mirror, not a lens ;) Its not the biggest mirror either, there are a number of 8 metre mirrors in use now, Hubble's mirror is 2.4 metres.


They don't take photos of Sol, Earth or the Moon with it either, from wiki:

>
The solar avoidance angle is about 45°, which is specified to keep sunlight from illuminating any part of the OTA. Earth and Moon avoidance is to keep bright light out of the FGSs and to keep scattered light from entering the instruments. If the FGSs are turned off, however, the Moon and Earth can be observed. Earth observations were used very early in the program to generate flat-fields for the WFPC1 instrument.

Whilst they could point it at Earth, they wouldn't be able to guide it without the Fine Guidance Sensors, plus theres a lack of guidestars on Earth even if the FGSs could be used!
D70, D200, CP5700
User avatar
Gordon
Member
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory

Postby Killakoala on Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:06 am

I can't wait until the Hubble is replaced with something bigger and better (If ever.)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby kingdean on Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:38 pm

The only reason it's still going is due to emotional attachment to the Hubble from the public and such

It is out dated and need to be replaced and I don't see why not, higher quality images with better sensors would aid the Science and the general population who want to see pretty pictures
kingdean
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Mackay, QLD 4740

Postby Oneputt on Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:17 pm

Those images are mind blowing and I now have a new desktop. :D Thank you for the link. :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Steffen on Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:47 am

Oneputt wrote:Those images are mind blowing and I now have a new desktop. :D Thank you for the link. :D


Same here. I've been looking for hi-res wallpapers for my new monitor, and some of these are plenty big! I picked five of them that take turns as my wallpaper now. Good stuff!

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Steffen on Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:54 am

kingdean wrote:The only reason it's still going is due to emotional attachment to the Hubble from the public and such

It is out dated and need to be replaced and I don't see why not, higher quality images with better sensors would aid the Science and the general population who want to see pretty pictures


It's not just pretty pictures. Those HST shots have us in awe because they illustrate what everybody knew from textbooks but nobody ever saw before. I personally don't remember seeing individual stars in galaxies (other than our own, and not counting supernovas) before HST.

Sure, better telescopes will follow, but the HST has earned its place in scientific history.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW


Return to Information