Night time shotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Night time shotsI've been playing with the camera every chance I get at night as I'm convinced I should be able to get hand-held night time shots to work if I'm persistent.
Just visited Geelong last Thursday to freeze my but off. On Wed night I popped out of the Hotel to have a walk and a look-see (was just over 0c at the time with a wind chill at around -5c). This shot was at ISO1600, 1/13sec f4.5 with the kit lens at 18mm I'm now fairly confident that this sort of shot is worth doing again. I tried my luck on darker items that I was struggling to see with my own eyes and that was a waste of time but certainly ISO1600 worked better than I expected. The shots came up looking exactly at the light levels I could see with my eyes. I just had to tuck my elbows in to keep the camera steady.
Paul - I really quite like this shot and think you've nailed it. Here's why I like it:
1)Look at it for more than a few seconds and the lines draw you to the mid back of the image...it captures you! 2)You have positioned yourself well to take the shot, it isn't too busy yet it incorporates a lot of different objects into it, i.e the nature element (trees, which dominate most of the shot) and the man made structures- bike rack, seats, cars, light poles, shops, shop lights etc) 3)The footpath lights appeal to me also, they help lead the shot into the distance with the help of the trees and also the different pavers... . I think it's a very different/unique shot!! My hat goes off to you sir...well done, and keep on posting! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Paul
I very much agree with Geoff on this. One point that I've found is that at 1600 ISO noise can become a real issue. Hard to tell at this size, but it's very much a factor to consider. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I really like this shot, the more you look at it, the more interesting things you see. The way the trees and lights draw you down the centre of the photo is a great effect.
When you look at the pavers at real pixel size then noise is quite high. I didn't get to run a noise reduction program on it as I'm just waiting for a new version of PS at the moment. (playing with Elements 2.0 at the moment). Thanks for the positive comments guys. This was just across the road. Shot at 1/6sec at f6.3 - somehow got away with handheld.
Paul. That new shot is great. Hand held and freezing cold. Impressive. (Oh and the shot itself is a good one too. I like the colours and the composition)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|