Hmmm... I can see that, once again, we've all got different ideas of what the contest is about...
Unless we get some guidance from the guy who chose the theme, I'm afraid that this is going to lead to the variable entries and voting patterns that we saw in the last contest...
In the article that was supplied by Flyer, it said:
It can be assumed that he was not talking about landscape photographers making pictures of immovable mountains, or still life photographers or architectural photographers. [And just as obviously, given the year of his essay, he was not talking about some poor soul trying to digitally manufacture a great moment after the fact in PhotoShop.]
What he was talking about was only one type of shooting: call it journalism, documentary photography, spot news photography, interpretative or environmental portraiture – even snapshooting.
When I first saw the the theme and before I read the article, I saw it as requiring a photo that captured a moment in time that would not happen again... an action, an expression, an event, a defining moment...
I definitely wouldn't expect to see any macros or landscapes or ducks (unless they were doing something very extraordinary) in this competition...
Maybe Flyer would like to give us some guidance before we create too many tangents for ourselves...
I understand what you mean about the title, but I feel that this competition should be more about the quality of the photograph than the cleverness of the title...