Yi-P wrote:What I noticed is that during the show, the maximum number of photos the presenter ever loaded was about 25-30 on display and 3-6 on the loadings...
He has yet to show the performance and speed of the software when working in conjuction of hundreds of images together.
On my machine I have no fear of libraries with thousands of images. I must admit that LR 1.0 has slowed down significantly once I've loaded up
55,000 images (all on a fileserver connected by 100 Mbps ethernet, which doesn't help) although it's still usable. That many images on Firewire-connected storage is faster (although with that many images the RAM footprint of LR is still fairly large) but in this setup I'm splitting my library into smaller chunks, each with maybe less than 10,000 images. It's easy to have multiple libraries (although you can only have one open at a time).
This is one of the areas where iView MediaPro is still better: handling large libraries (although it has its own performance issues when dealing with networked files). And thus like a few people I'm integrating LR into my existing MediaPro strategies and waiting to see what develops in LR's DAM functionality in the future.
BTW, this is on a 1.3GHz G4 Mac with 1.25GB RAM. I'm planning upgrades to my hardware in the coming year that will improve the CPU, RAM, and network throughput which will improve lots of things including LR.
Laurie, are you going from experience with a public beta on a Windows machine? I think you'll be much happier with the performance of 1.0.