Had a play with something interesting? Got something that we all covet? Found a real lemon? Write a few lines about it, and share your experiences.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by padey on Tue May 09, 2006 10:18 am
Not a review (yet), just a preview. I got home yesterday to find a package sitting at my front door. I wasn't sure what it was, and was very surprised to see that this arrived 12 days early!!!
It was about tucker time, so I fired up the BBQ, threw on some mystery meat and took some first shots.
I'm not sure what f-stop this was. As i hadn't added the lens info to the D200 by this stage. But this one is about f2-f2.8ish
f1.4
f1.4
f1.4
I've got a wedding on saturday, so i'll try it then and give you all a real review.
Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by shutterbug on Tue May 09, 2006 10:20 am
hmmm.....yummy
What was the damage 
-

shutterbug
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
- Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown
by MCWB on Tue May 09, 2006 10:55 am
Looks good Andrew. Will be interested to see how it compares to the Nikkor equivalent!
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
by padey on Tue May 09, 2006 10:57 am
$500 USD for the lens.
$40 USD for the shipping.
$2 AUD for the mystery meat.
$0 for customs. lucky me.
Being told by a train guard today not to take photos due to "security risks" - priceless.
f1.4

Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by huynhie on Tue May 09, 2006 11:38 am
padey wrote:$500 USD for the lens. $40 USD for the shipping. $2 AUD for the mystery meat. $0 for customs. lucky me. Being told by a train guard today not to take photos due to "security risks" - priceless. f1.4 
AUD10,000 for the tripple heart bypass after consuming sausages with cheese on top
Looking forward to seeing your wedding pics further on.
-

huynhie
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
- Location: Sydney
by birddog114 on Tue May 09, 2006 11:46 am
US$500.00? is it worth to own it than the Nikkor 50/1.4?
What're the pros and con? but it seems to me it's overpriced.
Last edited by birddog114 on Tue May 09, 2006 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by Glen on Tue May 09, 2006 3:22 pm
Andrew, look forward to your review. I thought the same as Huynhie, all that cheese can't be good on top of the fat content of sausages 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by padey on Tue May 09, 2006 4:51 pm
Don't worry fellas, i washed them down with a beer, opps i mean carrot juice.
Here is some taken in a flash-free museum.
D200 ISO 1400 f1.4
D200 ISO 1600 f2.8

Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by nito on Tue May 09, 2006 7:07 pm
I am amazed at the iso performance of the D200 and the sharpness of the lens.
-
nito
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
- Location: Gladesville, NSW
by Killakoala on Tue May 09, 2006 7:28 pm
Looks good so far. I look forward to seeing how it goes with portraits.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by christiand on Tue May 09, 2006 8:08 pm
The lens seems to be a beauty. BTW it is a Zeiss, not a Ziess
(I'm an old 'Kraut", I should know ...  )
I'm also looking forward to portrait shots and some reproductive photography.
Regards,
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by MCWB on Tue May 09, 2006 9:00 pm
christiand wrote:reproductive photography.
Porn euphamism? 
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
by christiand on Tue May 09, 2006 9:21 pm
Hi MCWB,
porn ?  Not
You may have discovered one of my 'English being my second language'
'beauties'.
I have discovered a few of them over time and will not mention them ...
Reproductive photography, reproductional photography; the photography which in German is called Reproduktionsphotographie.
A certain type of photography which reproduces the image of things, mainly for printing purposes. BTW the same word for something in one language has a completely different meaning in another language.
i.e: the word preservative in English means chemicals which preserve
food.
The word Preservativ in German means condom.
I like my food with no condoms (preservatives) !!!
Regards,
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by MCWB on Tue May 09, 2006 9:28 pm
Excellent Christian, thanks!  Actually it's préservatif in French too, and again the classic student mistake is to ask, "Are there condoms in this wine/food/etc"? 
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
by padey on Sun May 14, 2006 5:10 pm
birddog114 wrote:US$500.00? is it worth to own it than the Nikkor 50/1.4? What're the pros and con? but it seems to me it's overpriced.
Birdy,
The con is the price and on some F-mount bodies you'll find it hard to MA in low light. Made even harder with a shallow DOF wide open.
The pro is the contrast wide open. With the Nikkor glass at f1.4 you lose contrast, but with the zeiss it retains it.
1. Shot in RAW, converted to jpg, resized. No other PP.
D200 ISO400 f5.6
2. Shot in RAW, converted to jpg, resized. No other PP.
D200 ISO100 f1.4
3. Shot in RAW, converted to jpg, B&W and sharpened.
D200 ISO1000 f2.8

Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by Michael on Sun May 14, 2006 5:14 pm
That last photo is a winner!!!!
very nice.
Are we there yet?
-

Michael
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
- Location: Toowoomba QLD
-
by birddog114 on Sun May 14, 2006 5:16 pm
So the Nikkor 50/1.4 is still safe to play and I still like or prefer the mood of the nikkor 50/1.4 than the Zeiss.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by Alex on Sun May 14, 2006 5:21 pm
Great wedding shots, especially the last one. Congratulations, the lens seems fantastic.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by padey on Sun May 14, 2006 5:35 pm
Alex wrote:Great wedding shots, especially the last one. Congratulations, the lens seems fantastic.
Alex
Thanks Alex. This 50mm retains the most contrast wide open of any f1.4 I've used.
Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by Grev on Tue May 23, 2006 3:29 am
Zeiss glass is amazing! 
-

Grev
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
- Location: 4109, Brisbane.
-
Return to Equipment Reviews
|