Page 1 of 1

New lenses???

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:57 pm
by Muzza22au
Hey Guys, was just after some information regarding a good to great macro and wide angle lense for my D80!
Any information would be appreciated!

Cheers

Scott

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:58 pm
by digitor
Some information for you:

The Nikkor 12-24mm is a good wide angle lens (note the spelling) .

A lot of people swear by the Sigma 10-20mm at less than half the price of the Nikkor.

Tamron make a very well regarded 90mm macro lens.

And, the plural of "lens" is "lenses" (no need for an apostrophe!). :lol: :lol:

Cheers

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 2:28 am
by Muzza22au
digitor wrote:Some information for you:

The Nikkor 12-24mm is a good wide angle lens (note the spelling) .

A lot of people swear by the Sigma 10-20mm at less than half the price of the Nikkor.

Tamron make a very well regarded 90mm macro lens.

And, the plural of "lens" is "lenses" (no need for an apostrophe!). :lol: :lol:

Cheers


Yeah get the point on Lenses :lol: ...

What is the Nikon 105mm VR Micro like? I think I can get it for just over $1000.00!

Also is the MPE-65 available in Nikon Mount? And where would I get one from?

Cheers

Scott

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:25 am
by radar
If you can afford the Nikkor lenses, they are great but you pay for it.

I would suggest you look also at the Tokina 12-24, it is a great wide angle lens and the price is half the Nikkor. A lot of the reviews I have found rate the Tokina as good as the Nikkor. I have the Tokina and find that it is a great lens.

Last I had heard the Tokina was hard to get but check with Gary in the bargains.

I have the 90mm Tamron macro as well. For the price it is hard to beat.

Cheers,

André

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:20 am
by iluxa
Tokina 12-24/4 is just a little bit worser than Nikkor 12-24/4 but if we compare the price... twice higher... but Nikkor can handle flare better than Tokina. I own Tokina and I'm happy with that. However if I had a lot of spare money...

For macro I can suggest Sigma 105/2.8 EX DG Macro. This lens has just outstanding quality. The quality of this lens can compete with Nikkor 105/2.8 easily. I really love this lens. It has probably the best price/value ratio in all current macro lenses.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:24 pm
by marc
I can highly recommend the Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro, very sharp and great value!

Cheers
Marc

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:32 pm
by marc
iluxa wrote:Tokina 12-24/4 is just a little bit worser than Nikkor 12-24/4 but if we compare the price... twice higher... but Nikkor can handle flare better than Tokina. I own Tokina and I'm happy with that. However if I had a lot of spare money...



Hi iluxa

Money wasn't the issue for me with the Tokina 12-24 over the Nikon (apart from the flare/build qual), I found the Tokina sharper than the Nikon IMHO :wink:
my 2c

Cheers
Marc

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:21 pm
by iluxa
marc wrote:Money wasn't the issue for me with the Tokina 12-24 over the Nikon (apart from the flare/build qual), I found the Tokina sharper than the Nikon IMHO :wink:

Looks like I've made the right choice. 8)

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:38 pm
by Muzza22au
marc wrote:
iluxa wrote:Tokina 12-24/4 is just a little bit worser than Nikkor 12-24/4 but if we compare the price... twice higher... but Nikkor can handle flare better than Tokina. I own Tokina and I'm happy with that. However if I had a lot of spare money...



Hi iluxa

Money wasn't the issue for me with the Tokina 12-24 over the Nikon (apart from the flare/build qual), I found the Tokina sharper than the Nikon IMHO :wink:
my 2c

Cheers
Marc


Do you have any examples of images with this lense?

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:30 am
by marc
Will try and chase some up when I return home next week.

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:52 am
by Cre8tivepixels
I cannot fault my Toikna 12-24mm, its honestly as sharp as a tack (100% sharper than the sigma version i did have) and suprises me everytime.....i quite often mistake some shots (sharpness) for the 17-35mm Nikon before investigating further and seeing that the shot was the tokina...

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:52 am
by Muzza22au
marc wrote:Will try and chase some up when I return home next week.


Thanks for that!

I have seen this one online! What do you think of the price?

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:10 am
by iluxa
Muzza22au wrote:
marc wrote:Will try and chase some up when I return home next week.

Thanks for that!

Do you need original size images? As I have a lot of resized ones on my website. For example: one, two and three. All three were done with Tokina 12-24/4 on Nikon D70.

Muzza22au wrote:I have seen this one online! What do you think of the price?

Right price. I've bought mine for roughly the same price.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:54 pm
by Muzza22au
iluxa wrote:
Muzza22au wrote:
marc wrote:Will try and chase some up when I return home next week.

Thanks for that!

Do you need original size images? As I have a lot of resized ones on my website. For example: one, two and three. All three were done with Tokina 12-24/4 on Nikon D70.

Muzza22au wrote:I have seen this one online! What do you think of the price?

Right price. I've bought mine for roughly the same price.


I just quickly checked out your photos and it looks like I will go for the Tokina! Definately looks like a decent lense from your examples!

Scott

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:20 am
by Eugene-K
Muzza22au wrote:Do you have any examples of images with this lense?


You can find very many original size images taken with Tokina 12-24 (or with any other lens) here
http://www.pixel-peeper.com/adv/
Hope it will help you to make right decision
:)