Wide Angle for Landscapes

Had a play with something interesting? Got something that we all covet? Found a real lemon? Write a few lines about it, and share your experiences.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Wide Angle for Landscapes

Postby kingsley on Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:41 pm

Would like to get myself a wdie angle for taking landscapes/cityscapes etc

seen this on ebay
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... eName=WDVW

wondered if this is a good price,anyone else using this lens?

Unfortunatly unable to push the boat out far enough to get the Nikon 12-24

Any comments welcome

Cheers

Graham
kingsley
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:25 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Postby phillipb on Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:48 pm

Graham, I almost bought this lens, changed my mind because it doesn't take filters in the front. I believe the quality is very good. You can find it at a better price though.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby stubbsy on Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:49 pm

Graham. The Sigma 12-24 is a very good lens and there are a number of members here who are extremely happy with their purchase. One thing though is that if you work on getting your post count (meaningfully) past 30 and becaome a fully fledged member you have access to our bargains area where this and a number of other lenses are available at attractive prices. PS don't forget to factor GST into the ebay price.

Edit: I'll add to phillip's comment above. I bought the Nikon lens for the same reason (takes filters), plus the Nikon is smaller and lighter. FOr me a landscape lens that can't take a circular polariser is a bad thing. But you're right the Nikon costs a fair amount more.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby endymion on Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:51 pm

Graham,

The alternative is the Nikon lens, which I have, which is a very nice lens indeed but somewhat more expensive than the sigma. It has the advantage of being able to take front filters as well. One thing I wonder about though is it possible to fit a cokin system to the sigma? I don't think it would help with polarisers but they're fraught with difficulty on wide angles anyway.

Cheers,

Bruce
endymion
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:17 am

endymion wrote:Graham,

The alternative is the Nikon lens, which I have, which is a very nice lens indeed but somewhat more expensive than the sigma. It has the advantage of being able to take front filters as well. One thing I wonder about though is it possible to fit a cokin system to the sigma? I don't think it would help with polarisers but they're fraught with difficulty on wide angles anyway.

Cheers,

Bruce


Bruce,
Cokin systems won't work with the Sigma 12-24 as front filter, I've tried it. The only way is : using the gel filter in the rear of the lens.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby kingsley on Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:17 am

Thanks for the replies guys.

Will need to increase my posting and try and get full membership!

phillipb,any tips on where there are better prices.

Cheers

Graham
kingsley
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:25 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Postby Antsl on Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:11 pm

A consideration if you are looking for a good wideangle is the Tokina ATX 12-24mm lens. Like the Nikon it is a constant f4. I have already tested it once against the Nikon and the results off it are great. Planning on doing more testing in the near future.

The price on the lens is about $1050 (less than half the cost of the Nikon). Google it and you will find a few good reviews.
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Postby Kristine on Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:00 pm

kingsley wrote:phillipb,any tips on where there are better prices.


Get your post count above 30 and post an image; you will then become a "full member" and have access to the bargains section! :)
Kristine
Member
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:02 pm
Location: Western Australia

Postby Kristine on Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:03 pm

Antsl wrote:A consideration if you are looking for a good wideangle is the Tokina ATX 12-24mm lens. Like the Nikon it is a constant f4. I have already tested it once against the Nikon and the results off it are great. Planning on doing more testing in the near future.

The price on the lens is about $1050 (less than half the cost of the Nikon). Google it and you will find a few good reviews.


Hi Antsl and welcome to the forum!

The Tokina has some really good reviews online - looks like a fine lens.
Kristine
Member
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:02 pm
Location: Western Australia

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:23 am

Antsl wrote:A consideration if you are looking for a good wideangle is the Tokina ATX 12-24mm lens. Like the Nikon it is a constant f4. I have already tested it once against the Nikon and the results off it are great. Planning on doing more testing in the near future.

The price on the lens is about $1050 (less than half the cost of the Nikon). Google it and you will find a few good reviews.

Antsl

The price of the Nikon 12-24 through the forum is significantly lower than what you're implying here and the Sigma is close to the price of the (less good) Tokina. That's one of the benfits of a forum like this for those who participate (ie never buy/pay retail again and ignore Maxwell's inflated prices).
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kingsley on Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:42 pm

thanks,Kristine will work on getting my post count up.

Just posted my first pano attempt in the image reviews[


quote="Kristine"]
kingsley wrote:phillipb,any tips on where there are better prices.


Get your post count above 30 and post an image; you will then become a "full member" and have access to the bargains section! :)[/quote]
kingsley
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:25 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Postby Neeper on Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:27 pm

I might get flamed on here. But I have read many reviews from end users, that the Tokina lens is a great lens. I've looked at monay comparisons of photos, and look like the Tokina is a winner. Especially for the price. Check these links:

http://www.nikoncafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3286

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic2/208724
Johnny
D200, D70, 18-70mm, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 24-120mm VR, 12-24mm Tokina, 70-300mm Tamron, Lens Baby 2.0, Peleng Fisheye 8mm, SB800, Alien Bees Studio Setup: 1 B400, 2 B800, 1 B1600, Sekonic L-358
http://www.jtimagesonline.com
User avatar
Neeper
Member
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada

Postby birddog114 on Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:14 am

Information for people whomever is interested in Sigma 10-20

This reply is from Sigma...

"Thank you for your inquiry.


Unfortunately, the production of 10-20mm has been delayed. We are hoping that they will be available sometime in July but we have not been informed with the date of availability from our headquarters in Japan yet.

We appreciate your patience."
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby gstark on Thu Jun 23, 2005 10:44 am

Antsl wrote:(less than half the cost of the Nikon).


Not if you're a fully qualified member here ....
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22916
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby stubbsy on Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:38 am

gstark wrote:
Antsl wrote:(less than half the cost of the Nikon).


Not if you're a fully qualified member here ....

So you read my post above, Gary :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby gstark on Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:41 am

stubbsy wrote:So you read my post above, Gary :wink:


Eventually, yes.

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22916
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby mudder on Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:41 pm

Antsl wrote:A consideration if you are looking for a good wideangle is the Tokina ATX 12-24mm lens. Like the Nikon it is a constant f4. I have already tested it once against the Nikon and the results off it are great. Planning on doing more testing in the near future...


G'day Antsl,
I'd be keen as mustard to hear your thoughts on the Tokina 12-24. I'm wanting to splurge and get a nice WA lens, was thinking Nkkon, but waiting to see reports on the Tokina and the new Sigma 10-20 (I think) coming out soon. I assume they both take front filters, as I'd like to be able to use CPL's, ND's and stuff...

Cheers.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby DVEous on Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:15 am

... Obsolete ...
Last edited by DVEous on Sat May 03, 2014 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DVEous
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:32 pm

Postby Antsl on Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:35 am

I think you are paying for a first generation lens... it was bound to be expensive! Have a look at the Tokina if you can although they have been hard to get hold of, simply because people are discovering they are good. In a test I posted on this forum recently you should be able to see that they Tokina and the Canon 10-22 walk all over the Nikon at f4.
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Check these possibilities

Postby cameraguy21773 on Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:55 am

regards
Mike Parker
Frederick, MD

Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
User avatar
cameraguy21773
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland USA - D2H, D1x (2), D70


Return to Equipment Reviews