Benro Tripods - Brief look
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:38 pm
Had a look at the Benro tipods at and after the minimeet on Saturday. First thoughts are that I am impressed. I primarily use a Gitzo 1348 with Gitzo 1321 self leveller and RRS BH55 pro ballhead.
The first impression was where is the Benro, I can see all the Gitzo's but what about the Benro? The Benro is almost indistinguishable from a Gitzo. These two brands are very very close in design and construction, to the point that without the label most people couldn't tell the difference.
Here is a photo with the Nikon 200-400 VR mounted on the Benro KB-2 (?) ballhead.
In physical appearance I only found a few differences between the Gitzo and Benro A) The Benro has a compass and levelling bullseye, the Gitzo just has a levelling bullseye B) The Benro has wider leg adjustment tabs at the top of the legs C) The Gitzo uses acorn nuts on the top of the legs, the Benro uses standard nuts
The nuts and tabs (Benro labelled Benro, Gitzo with Gitzo) can be seen in this photo:
Whilst I didn't really use the tripods at the Minimeet, I did have a decent play and must say I found the Benro tripods very good and comparable with Gitzo at a mere fraction of the price. The range isnt as wide yet, but if you after a classic tripod (as 95% are) at a very good price, you cant go past these if they meet your needs. If I didn't already own a Gitzo I would buy one of these.
They also have a range of ballheads, which can be seen in the photos below. I believe it was the KB2 which was on, a very comparable unit to the Markins. At a very cursory glance this looks to be a good unit, with a small amount of creep (which could have been operator error), should be equivalent to a Markins M10, but really needs to be properly reviewed. I know Steve (Killa) and MJ are both doing reviews so wont try to second guess there comments.
In use
The first impression was where is the Benro, I can see all the Gitzo's but what about the Benro? The Benro is almost indistinguishable from a Gitzo. These two brands are very very close in design and construction, to the point that without the label most people couldn't tell the difference.
Here is a photo with the Nikon 200-400 VR mounted on the Benro KB-2 (?) ballhead.
In physical appearance I only found a few differences between the Gitzo and Benro A) The Benro has a compass and levelling bullseye, the Gitzo just has a levelling bullseye B) The Benro has wider leg adjustment tabs at the top of the legs C) The Gitzo uses acorn nuts on the top of the legs, the Benro uses standard nuts
The nuts and tabs (Benro labelled Benro, Gitzo with Gitzo) can be seen in this photo:
Whilst I didn't really use the tripods at the Minimeet, I did have a decent play and must say I found the Benro tripods very good and comparable with Gitzo at a mere fraction of the price. The range isnt as wide yet, but if you after a classic tripod (as 95% are) at a very good price, you cant go past these if they meet your needs. If I didn't already own a Gitzo I would buy one of these.
They also have a range of ballheads, which can be seen in the photos below. I believe it was the KB2 which was on, a very comparable unit to the Markins. At a very cursory glance this looks to be a good unit, with a small amount of creep (which could have been operator error), should be equivalent to a Markins M10, but really needs to be properly reviewed. I know Steve (Killa) and MJ are both doing reviews so wont try to second guess there comments.
In use