Garden RoseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Garden RoseWell this isn't a very interesting subject. Just an attempt at getting to know the camera and what settings work and what settings don't. I tried 3 shots at this using a really crappy tripod. Need to get a decent set of legs and a head.
Lense: 18-70MM DX Focal Length: 70MM Exposure Mode: Manual Metering Mode: Multi-Pattern / Matrix ISO: 200 Shutter: 1/20 Apperture: F/13 WB: Direct Sunlight Color Mode: sRGB The exposure meter in the view finder was probably hitting about 2/3 steps over-exposure, but it appears about right. The first two shots were way overexposed so I cranked it right down to where I thought was about right. In photoshop I just applied auto-levels (too hot to do anything else) and adjusted the brightness and contrast a smidge. <img src="http://members.iinet.net.au/~darryl_m/GardenRose.jpg" width="1024">
I like the contrast of the warmth of the centre compared to the coolness of the bottom petals. The photo seems to potray the rose is alive to me.
Cheers Brett
One word!
Wow!! Great photo - might be (and might not be also) a little better if white highlights were a little less brighter. Shows how good the kit lens is though. Thanks for sharing Graham
It's not bad at all.
It looks like someone with lipstick on has been kissing it. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|