Some long range photographyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some long range photographyWent out to Sydney airport today and exercised the 80-200 with a 2X convertor. Total focal length equal to 600mm.
The first pic shows the destructive effect of heat haze. A common problem when using long lenses on a hot day. http://www.pbase.com/matt_k/image/37583512 http://www.pbase.com/matt_k/image/37583564 http://www.pbase.com/matt_k/image/37583577 http://www.pbase.com/matt_k/image/37583578 Last edited by Matt. K on Fri Dec 17, 2004 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Regards
Matt. K
QANTAS sshould pay you for the third shot. They are all neat an in the middle. Is that your own 80-200 Matt?
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300 PPOK
Dargan
It is an older F/2.8 push/pull AF lens. It does a nice job. By the way...I beleive in the end...we know everything. It comes to us at the exact moment of death. We just don't get time to pass it on. Regards
Matt. K
You should send that last one in to the Terror Hotline. That bloke jumping the fence looks dodgy.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Oxymoron alert! g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
ajoe43
I'm not sure why this is happening. I download my images to the desktop using Nikon Transfer. I have set this program to capture the full Exif by clicking on the little tool icon at top right and clicking in the box that refers to the Exif. I then process in Photoshop CS and resize for Pbase in CS before saving into a folder. It may be you are not capturing all of the Exif when you initially download from the camera....but that's just a guess. Regards
Matt. K
Thanks Matt. I think because I don't use nikon transfer that is the problem. I just drag the photos accross to my c: drive from the card reader in the laptop using explorer (I hear the good workflow people gasping)
Regards
Jonesy
G'day,
I might be a heathen, but all I've ever done is cut and paste from the card reader to my hard drive... I never thought that would make any diff as you're copying the entire file etc... Cheers, Mudder. Aka Andrew
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|