Fire and life

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Fire and life

Postby dooda on Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:27 am

Yeah the title is a little over dramatic. I got about two standard photos of these little bulbs, and liked the effect. Thought that I would arrange the candles a little bit and took this one. I'd like to know your thoughts. I think it is the most interesting of the bunch. In looking at it now however, maybe the candle in the foreground is a little too much, and the subject could use a little more depth of field. I find it quite pleasing. Be as ruthless as you care to be. This was taken with the 50mm 1.8. I love this lens, and the bokeh truly moves me. I find it a little difficult in the small room taking candids, and am seeriously looking at the fixed 24mm 2.8 as my next splurge, as it's probably easier to move in closer to the subject then to constantly be moving back, and focusing is a little easier I imagine. The 50 works well with stills especially.

http://www.pixspot.com/displayimage.php ... 0007&pos=0

I'd like to add another thankyou to Pixbot for the free image hosting.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby stubbsy on Sun Dec 26, 2004 1:27 pm

dooda

This is just me perspective as a novice, but I agree about the candle at the front. Try croping it out completely (I covered it with my hand on the screen) and you get a very different effect - the bulbs dominate more rather than the out of focus candle.

Cheers
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Glen on Sun Dec 26, 2004 2:28 pm

Dooda, you live in a place where you have to keep candles alight just to keep the bulbs warm at night? Move to Australia, no mountains, but a guy like you would never feel cold here :D

Like the shot much better with the front candle cropped, brings the bulbs into play when they dont seem to be in the full version. Nice take on a still life
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby mudder on Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:29 pm

G'day,
Wow, I read the reply re: cover the bottom candle and it does really change the entire "mood" of the shot and the sub-conscious focus on the subject, which I assume are the bulbs... Block the rear one and not much diff... Wonder if that's because we're looking "up" the photo or something??? Something pyschological or just because it's in front of the "subject"?

Nice shot though, something different... I like it, thanks for sharing :-)

Cheers,
Mudder
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby dooda on Mon Dec 27, 2004 11:16 pm

Yeah,

I took a couple of shots, then I thought of putting the candles around it. I think that the reason why it works without the candle in the foreground is that it distracts the eye with all of the light as the eye tries to make it's way to the subject of the photo. The background candle is pleasant enough because the eye has already found the subject, but the foreground light is sort of a blocker. I find the way light distracts our eye, as well as the way the eye travels a picture to be fastenating, and one of the major issues behind what makes a photo really work. Thanks for the comments.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques