Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by wendellt on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:49 am
I think correct exposure and an appealing end result are both relative things
This series of portraits shot with the nikkor 85mm f1.4 used high iso and slower shutterspeeds to blow out the skin and background which gives the overall image a certain mood, also fixes up blemishes and dark spots on the face.
I fiddled with the white balance to get these as white as possible
this one has been smoothed out in photoshoip due to banding(jpeg images)
look at at that delicious creamy bokeh!
shot wide open at f1.4, you can see the softness, but for portraiture it's a good soft
this image shows the correct exposure and white balance
.
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by owen on Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:26 am
Very nice photos Wendell, and I agree that the overexposed look suits them very well.
-

owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
by Oscar on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:05 am
Nice shots Wendell. #1 has a spacey feel to it. I like #2 and #4 for the soft natural look the exposure has given them. Cheers, Mick
-

Oscar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
- Location: Panania, Sydney
by Slider on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:31 am
Great stuff Wendell  Love the 3rd
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by Geoff on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:42 am
Brilliant again Wendell. #3 is my pic 
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Greg B on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:44 am
Great shots wendell, number 3 is my favourite shot too, but the girl in #2 is seriously cute 
Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
-

Greg B
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
- Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne
-
by Link on Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:12 am
Waw, nice series...
Number 1 doesn't really work because the overexp erases her face 'frame' just up the model's left eye.
Number 2 has great skin tone and is really nice except for this bit of strong reflection in the model's right eye.
My fav is definitely number 3 - warm white balance, slight overexp, and the way the model looks outside the frame; it all conveys a strong moody atmosphere.
Regarding number 4, I like the "non-natural" ones, it makes the model's blue eyes stand out.
Generally speaking I like to overexp portraits too for exactly the same reasons you mentioned - fixing skin blemishes and dark spots... However, I'm pretty sure that top-notch professional results requires quite a bit of post-processing!
Link.
-

Link
- Member
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:07 pm
- Location: Nowra
by myarhidia on Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:13 am
Hi Wendell,
with #1 I think a much tighter crop would be more appropriate, it looks as if she has gorrilla arms in proportion to her face, however love the way you captured her eyes.
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
-

myarhidia
- Member
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney, So where the bloody hell are you?
by PiroStitch on Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:24 am
Top pics as usual Wendell. I think the most important factor in 1,2 and 4 are the eyes. Lovely, sharp and mesmerising that you forget there are other elements in the pic
#3 is very nostalgic - one of your traits and styles I've noticed in some of your pics.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by admajic on Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:43 pm
As usual Wendell, great images of great women. This sharpness on the eyes is outstanding. Im already in love with no. 2. How can we meet her 
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
-

admajic
- Member
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
- Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction
by robw25 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:03 pm
what a beauty #2 is !!!!!!!!
wendell well done
cheers rob
-

robw25
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:31 pm
- Location: whyalla south australia
-
by stormygirl on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:53 pm
Pure magic again Wendell! Love them all.
-

stormygirl
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Melbourne, VIC
-
by zafra52 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:55 pm
Thery are excellent portraits Wendellt. You've done a great job!
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by Six on Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:44 pm
Wow, they are all excellent, I actually quite like #1, with those eyes and the expression she has. #3 is very good too, maby a bit too soft?
-
Six
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:24 pm
- Location: Lilyfield, Sydney
-
by digitor on Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:04 pm
Number 2 does it for me - (what it does, I won't say  ) the eyes have it!
#3 has a nice dreamy quality, too. Well done (again)
Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
-

digitor
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
- Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia
by Matt. K on Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:06 pm
Wendell
You learn very quickly!
Nice work! All you need now are some attractive models! 
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by wendellt on Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:19 pm
thankyou everyone
still comfortable on headshots even though im briefed to take full length to include the fashion!
I still get those full length shots but somehow doesn't look as nice as a tight shot
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by mudder on Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:55 pm
Wendell I always enjoy your stuff...
The first one is captivating, seems dreamy soft (although I'm not sure, the arms seems "bigger" or something? Effect from close-up?), The second almost seems floating it's so seperated from the background and love the tones in #3... Great stuff...
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by asaroha on Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:16 pm
Love #2 and #3!
Phone number ?
-

asaroha
- Member
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:22 pm
- Location: Sydney CBD
-
by Yi-P on Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:18 am
Love #3's mood and #2's creamy taste!!
Now Im even more attracted to this lens 
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|