
200mm f3.3

a few more;
http://www.catoandpade.com.au/gallery/Wedding-LG
wedding shots: a few different ones.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
wedding shots: a few different ones.Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Great photos Padey. My only question with the second shot (and it's a probably very stupid question) - where the male hands from two different blokes? The right hand has the suit sleeve down whilst the left hand doesn't.
Cheers P
No it's the same guy. He is hugging his bride from behind, hence the streach. Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Beautiful images Andrew!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Andrew
I like the second image and the concept of the first, but the odd DOF in #1 distracts me with the beading on the right and the upper hand on the left in sharp focus. For me I'd have preferred both hands in focus to grab my eye (and yes I'm being picky since I know hard it would be to achieve that in the environment you were working in - I'm just being greedy) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I think it's terrific to see something a little bit "different" in wedding albums, shows creativity... Checked out the album, you have some very nice shots in there... Particularly liked:
http://www.catoandpade.com.au/gallery/a ... .thumb.jpg and http://www.catoandpade.com.au/gallery/a ... .thumb.jpg Well done... Aka Andrew
Picked the same photos as you ![]() Very well done, Absolutely love your work ![]()
Greedy and Picky is why we come to 'reviews and critiques'. All coments are welcome. Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
lovely work mate, and dammit, now I am lusting that 85mmF/1.4 even more! How smooth was that
![]() Mark Greenmantle
http://www.elffinarts.com / mark at elffinarts dot com D70, 50mm/F1.8, kit lens, 80-200mm/F2.8, 35-70mm/f2.8, two 160w/sec slave strobes, sb600, "taller than me" astronomical tripod "can I have that step ladder please"
i've heard about those types of wedding, you usually bring your own baby oil. Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|