Something not quite right - kids portraitsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Something not quite right - kids portraitsHi all,
I took these as a favour for my next door neighbours and something doesn't seem right. Any advice much appreciated.
The lighting is very flat. Some fill-flash would have helped.
If you have CS3, you can apply some fill lighting in PP. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Here's one of the pix with only a simple levels adjustment. If you have the RAW file, using some fill lighting would give an even better result, but you can see that it doesn't take too much of a tweak to give it some more snap.
Good luck! TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
I did a very quick adjustment: Open file in CS3 Open new levels adjustment layer Go to the three eye-droppers; click on the black eye-dropper. Find the blackest part of the image (I used the pupil of an eye) and click Then, select the white eye-dropper and find the whitest area (but not a blown highlight) (I used her shirt) and click. These adjustments just compress the histogram to give you greater contrast. That's all I did. You could also adjust the mid-tones by using the centre eye-dropper in the same way, but there was nothing I could see immediately in the image that would represent a neutral mid-tone, and I didn't want to introduce a colour cast. The image looks slightly warm to me, and if I were working on it, I might be tempted to adjust the WB slightly. Hope this helps. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Exposure and contrast/lighting issues aside, that first shot is a great capture, very nice work.
Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
There's nothing wrong with these images that a little curves or level adjustment can't cure. They look much better when opened in PShop then they do here on the forum so I'd suggest just a slight curves adjustment to make them pop. If you have CS3 then also try a little shadows/highlight adjustment. Nice work!
Regards
Matt. K
Thanks Matt. I've been playing around with them a bit tonight and they do look a lot better just openeing them in Photosho. Any idea why?
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|