Sydney Harbour Sunset Shoot - Model StaceyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sydney Harbour Sunset Shoot - Model StaceyThanks for looking had a wonderful shoot with Stacey (FHM/Ralph) Tuesday afternoon.......
Cheers Have a great day Dan
Hi Dan, Your photography is up to your normal high standards, but in these images I think the posing is not quite appropriate. Your model seems to be carrying a little weight around the midriff and the poses do not do her any favours. Image 1 shows that but even more so on image 3, she seems to have no waist. Obviously you cant change her weight, but I think the poses could be better suited to her present size. PS just reread this and it sounded blunt, not meaning to be rude just think posing to suit her would be most attractive
i like the 2nd one nice tone and depth colours work harmoniously as well
the fill flash one against the sunset oen 3rd shot is techncially good but not that flattering looks like a front flash shot, lost the mood there more mood in 2nd as for pose to get someone to look taller make poses more compact, feet togehter not so much kink in the hips otherwsie shoot her more side on think slinky anyway one thing that is very noticable is the rapport between tog and model the expressions still looked forced she doesnt look that comfortable new model or not first tiem working with model its still the togs job to get the girl natural otherwise youll get these forced expressions as a third person looking at the shots its all techncially good but its unflattering because of the pose and expression she should look ravising and desirable etc also last shot leaning forward foreshortens model perspective thing, i notice you do that alot body straight for her i also know on thes shoots things are complicated but im sure if you can pay more attention to these details it is possible anyays all that aside congratulations famous girl from fhm ralph must be a good life shooting beautiful people Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Awesome thanks guys.....i will work on the posing issue, she was a 'square' shaped girl, she had no hips at all......but thanks for the time taken to help me out
Are either of these two shots more flattering... Its funny isn't it, i really thought i got the best out of her, posing wise, and was really happy with the images, also did very little PP (for me anyhow) lol..its great though i still have so much to learn I just finished a shoot with Belinda Chapple (Ex Bardot Singer) and hopefully i corrected these issues....i need to go to Posing School....any ideas lol? Dan
Lol isn't it just..i always seem to pick the duds Dan
I'm actually kinda shocked that some would view this girl as to be 'carry a little weight'... the fashion industry has a lot to answer for if you ask me.. Oh and Dan.. lovely shots that I think she will be well pleased with... The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Sue, I mean that in the sense that she is carrying some weight for the style of model she is (FHM model) and the image she is trying to project. I don't recoil from my comments but totally understand yours. I don't think anyone would call her overweight in the street, but when we have hours to look over every minute detail, one can notice other things. I seriously don't think these are the most flattering shots of her, as evidenced by the next two images.
I agree with you about the fashion industry, some of the models don't represent even a remotely healthy look. Being lean though doesn't have to be at the exclusion of being healthy
Glen - I don't think she is at all - I think it comes purely down to the photo - the first pose is extremely unflattering, and I think that is what you are seeing, not actually 'some weight' as you put it Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
first one, she looks like she has some shape Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|