Sydney Harbour Sunset Shoot - Model Stacey

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Sydney Harbour Sunset Shoot - Model Stacey

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:34 am

Thanks for looking had a wonderful shoot with Stacey (FHM/Ralph) Tuesday afternoon.......

Image

Image

Image

Image

Cheers :)

Have a great day :)

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Glen on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:54 am

Hi Dan, Your photography is up to your normal high standards, but in these images I think the posing is not quite appropriate. Your model seems to be carrying a little weight around the midriff and the poses do not do her any favours. Image 1 shows that but even more so on image 3, she seems to have no waist. Obviously you cant change her weight, but I think the poses could be better suited to her present size. PS just reread this and it sounded blunt, not meaning to be rude just think posing to suit her would be most attractive
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby GK on Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:39 pm

The second and third shots are great!
The first shot does look wrong for her... not very flattering.
The last shot is making her face look strange. maybe a touch too much pp on that one.

GK
GK
Newbie
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:00 am
Location: East Sydney

Postby wendellt on Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:51 pm

i like the 2nd one nice tone and depth colours work harmoniously as well
the fill flash one against the sunset oen 3rd shot is techncially good but not that flattering looks like a front flash shot, lost the mood there
more mood in 2nd

as for pose to get someone to look taller make poses more compact, feet togehter not so much kink in the hips otherwsie shoot her more side on
think slinky

anyway one thing that is very noticable is the rapport between tog and model the expressions still looked forced she doesnt look that comfortable
new model or not first tiem working with model its still the togs job to get the girl natural otherwise youll get these forced expressions


as a third person looking at the shots its all techncially good but its unflattering because of the pose and expression
she should look ravising and desirable etc

also last shot leaning forward foreshortens model
perspective thing, i notice you do that alot
body straight for her

i also know on thes shoots things are complicated but im sure if you can pay more attention to these details it is possible

anyays all that aside congratulations famous girl from fhm ralph must be a good life shooting beautiful people
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:41 pm

Awesome thanks guys.....i will work on the posing issue, she was a 'square' shaped girl, she had no hips at all......but thanks for the time taken to help me out :)

Are either of these two shots more flattering...

Image
Image


Its funny isn't it, i really thought i got the best out of her, posing wise, and was really happy with the images, also did very little PP (for me anyhow) lol..its great though i still have so much to learn :)

I just finished a shoot with Belinda Chapple (Ex Bardot Singer) and hopefully i corrected these issues....i need to go to Posing School....any ideas lol?

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Glen on Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:25 pm

Dan,

Much prefer the last 2 you posted. Funny how we all see images differently.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:45 pm

Glen wrote:Dan,

Much prefer the last 2 you posted. Funny how we all see images differently.


Lol isn't it just..i always seem to pick the duds ;)

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Bindii on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:53 pm

Glen wrote:Hi Dan, Your photography is up to your normal high standards, but in these images I think the posing is not quite appropriate. Your model seems to be carrying a little weight around the midriff and the poses do not do her any favours. Image 1 shows that but even more so on image 3, she seems to have no waist. Obviously you cant change her weight, but I think the poses could be better suited to her present size. PS just reread this and it sounded blunt, not meaning to be rude just think posing to suit her would be most attractive


I'm actually kinda shocked that some would view this girl as to be 'carry a little weight'...

the fashion industry has a lot to answer for if you ask me..

Oh and Dan.. lovely shots that I think she will be well pleased with... :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby Glen on Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:51 pm

Sue, I mean that in the sense that she is carrying some weight for the style of model she is (FHM model) and the image she is trying to project. I don't recoil from my comments but totally understand yours. I don't think anyone would call her overweight in the street, but when we have hours to look over every minute detail, one can notice other things. I seriously don't think these are the most flattering shots of her, as evidenced by the next two images.

I agree with you about the fashion industry, some of the models don't represent even a remotely healthy look. Being lean though doesn't have to be at the exclusion of being healthy :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby blacknstormy on Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:53 pm

in the sense that she is carrying some weight for the style of model she is


Glen - I don't think she is at all - I think it comes purely down to the photo - the first pose is extremely unflattering, and I think that is what you are seeing, not actually 'some weight' as you put it :? :(
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Glen on Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:57 pm

Rel, that is a far nicer way to phrase it "she isn't lean enough for that pose". Thanks
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby obzelite on Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:37 pm

Cre8tivepixels wrote:Are either of these two shots more flattering...

Image

Dan


first one, she looks like she has some shape
Simon
www.colberne.com.au
I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
User avatar
obzelite
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:47 am
Location: Willagee, WA - D90


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques