Coffs HarbourModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Coffs HarbourDriving back from Brisvegas, we spent 5 relaxing days in Coffs.
Here are some images for which I would appreciate some C&C. As you can see, I have been trialling some PP effects as well. 1. Selective blur 2. First attempt at HDR 3. Coffs Jetty from Mutton Bird lookout 4. A 14 shot pano from atop Mutton Bird lookout (click for larger image) [ Photos of Alex to come (cause I just know everyone loves baby photos ) Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Patrick,
Absolutely love the first one! It has a "train set" kind of feel, I think they call this miniaturisation effect "tilt-shift" photography. Was this the effect you were trying to achieve? Would really appreciate if you could share a bit about how you processed this. Very well done on the others too, thanks for sharing. Cheers GaryR
40D, 24-105L/F4, 50/1.8, no talent
Thanks Gary That is exactly the effect I was aiming for (I did rush this one). I think these shots are best done when the light is more side on. Basically, my process was: 1. Increase brightness of image. 2. Increase saturation 3. (In this case) I used channel mixer (red -50, green +200, blue -50) to get the yellow/orange colour in the foliage to warm it up a little. 4. Applied a gaussian blur. 5. Using the history palette, I clicked on the last step before the gaussian blur, but selected the gaussian blur action. 6. I then used the history brush to pain the blur on the outer the areas I wanted to soften. I like this effect and want to refine my process. THanks for the comments. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
here's a link u may be interested in about "fake" tilt-shift
ive been meaning to try this for a long time now http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.photographyjam.com/images/41.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.photographyjam.com/articles/52/the-tilt-shift-miniature-fake-technique-in-photoshop-cs-a-simple-how-to%3Fpg%3D2&h=333&w=500&sz=63&hl=en&start=1&tbnid=Tt5Zeitm6evWKM:&tbnh=87&tbnw=130&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmodel%2Btrains%26gbv%3D2%26svnum%3D30%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DX Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D 50mm 1.8 EF
Great tute - thanks for posting it.
A very simple process - I applied it to this one for a bit of fun. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|