Sunday at The CreekModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sunday at The CreekThese are a few shots taken at Eastern Creek last Sunday. The first 3 were taken down at turn 2.
Shane Price with slightly modified front end. Tony D'Alberto Mark Winterbottom Some of the Jim Beam girls D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
Re: Sunday at The CreekBarry, your images all look like the word 'image'.
Whats doing there? 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Re: Sunday at The CreekNot sure Alan, I can see them on my screen. Can anyone help?
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
Re: Sunday at The CreekCan anyone else see???
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
Re: Sunday at The CreekYup, i'm seeing them no worries.
Nice shots too. Michael
Re: Sunday at The CreekAlan it must be that long distance cable you are using out there. BTW I did not have much success with 3X convertor. It was an old thing I found in the cupboard. Looks like it goes back in there.
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
Re: Sunday at The CreekNice work mate, had fun I take it?
Might be my monitor, but looks like the WB needs a tweak to the blue side, seem a bit warm over here Cheers. James. Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Re: Sunday at The CreekBarry, leave my long distance cable alone, smart ass!
Images are showing now, agree the WB seems a tad warm. What setting you use? Nice and sharp, they taken with the 70-200 or the 80-400? Any of the two gits on the inside of turn two? Cheers mate. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Re: Sunday at The CreekFirst three are 80-400 unless heavily cropped.
Re: Sunday at The CreekNice Barry
Shame we didn't catch up. Don't pick on poor Alan he can't help it if the string and tin cans don't reach over the mountains. Jeff
Re: Sunday at The Creek
Alan, car shots were taken with 80-400VR. Girls with 18-70 kit lens. I have two shots of the gits on the inside, sad looking specimens thou. Can publish if you like? As for the wb issue the car shots were taken with a sunny wb setting and appear to be ok on my monitor?? The girls were shot with a cloudy wb setting and fill flash (-1.3). When I looked again last night I backed the wb off the a temp of 5500K (daylight). How do they look now? D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|