Some portraitsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some portraitsJust some portraits from a shoot I did this weekend.
This is not a creative one, but something for stock library. The rest I took for myself. Thanks for looking, Alex
Re: Some portraitsLast 2 in this series are terrific alex. The only suggestion would be to offer the eyes in the last image a little more room to look into. Similarly in the second last a little tight for space around the apple.
cheers marco
Re: Some portraitsFor me, the second two are standouts - the lighting really works, particularly the tight lighting in the 3rd and the resultant falloff, which really emphasises the face.
I, personally, am not a fan of the soft glamour look used in the 4th - not sure why, just doesn't appeal to me, but I am aware a lot of other people like it. With the first, I am guessing (often poorly) that the photo is about consumerism or credit cards, and therefore you are not wanting to show the card provider, however, I would suggest showing the front of the card may have more impact as it is less busy than the back of the card? I am not sure if I explained that properly, but I know what I mean. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Some portraitsThanks for your useful comments, Patrick. I like the last two the most as well.
In the first, I deliberately turned the card over so that the logo of the card provider is not seen as a stock library would not allow brand names to be displayed. I could have photoshopped it out through. Cheers Alex
Re: Some portraitslove the second
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|