Attempt at HDRModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Attempt at HDRI have not posted much in a while, so here is one I have done as an HDR. Not done very much of this sort of thing before so advice form some HDR guru's would be greatly appreciated.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Attempt at HDRHi Geoff,
I assume you're using Photomatix because the image looks like it came thru Photomatix. Notice there is a lot of local contrast around the rigging of the yachts. The contrast in the sky ends up looking different on either side of a given piece of rigging. The mast on LHS is a particular example of this. If you adjust the top slider in Photomatix (I think it's called Strength) from the default (70% ?) down to about 25% - 30%, you will get rid of this obvious contrast differential. But this will tend to make the image look flatter. You've got to fiddle with strength and then with both highlight and shadow saturation to make it look right. You've also got some chromatic aberation coming thru. Photomatix seems to exagerate any CA. So it's absolutely essential to get rid of it from the tiffs before you do the HDR generate. The best way to do this is in the raw conversion. Take the image up to 100% size and look for the CA (green and blue areas on edges of high contrast). Adjust the CA sliders in the raw convertor to eliminate the CA. Then apply the same parameters to all the images in the bracket. If you're starting from Jpgs, then I don't know what to suggest to get rid of CA. Apart from start with raw images. The water doesn't look right. You need to select the checkbox that says to eliminate moving things. Try the two options here. Also the tone mapping always makes water too light so your reflections are too light. A reflection of anything is darker than the original, because some light is being absorbed. To correct for this, I take the tone mapped tiff and the best exposed original from the bracket into Photoshop and blend them together with opacity slider to bring the darker reflection into the image. Sharpening at the wrong time can ruin the HDR. Don't let the raw converter or camera do any sharpening. You do the sharpening after you've made the tone mapped image. There is no detail in the hot spots in the cloud. This means you ahven't got enough dynamic range in your bracket of shots. So you need to either increase the number of shots in the bracket or the EV difference between each shot. To get the sequence of exposures for an HDR, you need to get all the highlights in one shot and all the shadows in another and everything in between in the other shots. Clipping the highlights is particularly obvious whereas you can often get away with clipping the shadows. I assume you are bracketing in your camera and using a tripod. You should be. I haven't been able to produce a realistic looking HDR if I haven't used a tripod. I guess my last comment is that the idea of constructing an HDR image is to capture the high dynamic range, BUT to make the image look realistic. It takes alot of practise and tweaking of the various tone mapping parameters to make it look realistic. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Re: Attempt at HDRWow, thanks John for the magnitude of advice. I will take this onboard and try again. The original pic is just one raw file with exposure adjusted up and down on each of five copies. You are correct in your assumption regarding the use of Photmatix. Not knowing what I was doing I just had a play with various adjustments to come up with the image posted.
Thanks again for the advice. Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Attempt at HDR
Hi Geoff, you have to play with Photomatix alot to learn what it can and what it can't do. I have managed to get some great images using Photomatix (IMHO). I've also managed to make some really crap ones too. I hope some of the stuff I wrote is useful. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Re: Attempt at HDRWhat a great shot. I think as pointed out there are a couple of areas that could be improved but- Keep trying-that cloud and nice foreground could make this a winner (as well as straighten the horizon).
Robert Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
Re: Attempt at HDRYour image looks like one of those 'paper popouts' that were once popular with childrens books. Your processing technique is certainly eye catching but the image was good enough in the first place and didn't need the pop treatment.
Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|