Dee Why & AlexModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dee Why & AlexLast Saturday, Alex's playgroup had a birthday party for all the tackers turning 1 (of which Alex was one).
If you recall, Saturday exhibited some pretty dicey weather, including threats of storm, very choppy seas. I tried to capture this weather with the first two, however, I didn't quite capture the mood - perhaps I need some filters (yellow and red, perhaps). and two of Alex playing... These images are basically straight out of the camera (into the tank, via the scanner place and then into Bridge for a bit of sharpening). Film was FP4, developing was normal + 10%. I think I love this film. C&C appreciated Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Dee Why & Alexwow nice pics there! i love them all candids of your little fella are awesome.
did you scan these yourself? (surely you dont have a dLab2 at home ) -j
Re: Dee Why & AlexNo, saving up for the Epson V700 flatbed, but these were scanned at a lab in Brooky.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Dee Why & Alexvery nice photo,s love them all say happy bithday to the little fella they are great at that age love the expression on his face in his first photo
Honi soit qui mal y pense
camera Olympus sp550 uz
Re: Dee Why & AlexNice pics, I have been meaning to get some red filters to play with, with my F80. The filters really made a difference!!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Dee Why & AlexAwesome stuff! I almost miss the excitement of film...
Re: Dee Why & AlexThanks for the comments, guys. I really like the tonality of good B&W film. Even with a similar B&W digital conversion, I couldn't get the same kind of effect. Of course, it helps to get the exposure right.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Dee Why & AlexGeez, Alex is growing fast.
Love the FP4, it's my favourite film for portraits. Such nice tones. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|