Vicious attack dogModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Vicious attack dogMaybe a little less vicious and a little more dog but either way if you had food in your hand I'm pretty sure Harry would politely bark at you.
Comments and criticism would be greatly appreciated. No idea why the camera was set to ISO640 but it still looks ok. There has been a little PP on the shot, just basic level adjustment. Bigger version here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/22767657@N07/2645933696/ D300 - MB-D10 - Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8 - Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 - SB600
My stuff here http://www.flickr.com/photos/22767657@N07/
Re: Vicious attack dogOooo he's a cute little fella that's for sure!
My only comment on this would be perhaps for shots like this to either increase your depth of field or make sure that the Eyes are in focus as they are really the main subject of interest in most shots of Animals. Unless you meant to focus only on the nose, in that case ignore everything I just said. -Rob. If you’re alone with your friend in the woods and a tiger’s chasing you, you don’t have to be faster than the tiger, you have to be faster than your friend.
Re: Vicious attack dogNo you're right, I wanted the eyes in focus with a little more DOF, just didn't seem to work out that way
Thanks for the comment. D300 - MB-D10 - Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8 - Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 - SB600
My stuff here http://www.flickr.com/photos/22767657@N07/
Re: Vicious attack dog with the comments on the focus. Also watch the whites to prevent them from being burnt out too much.. Get rid of the foot stool on the right upper corner..
Re: Vicious attack dogI agree with you. I will take the footstool out of the shot tonight and I am sure it'll look a whole lot better.
Agree also on the comments on keeping the eyes in focus. Unfortunately Harry (the dog) is in Australia and I have moved to London so a repeat performance will be hard. He does love the camera though. There are more photos of him on my flickr page. D300 - MB-D10 - Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8 - Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 - SB600
My stuff here http://www.flickr.com/photos/22767657@N07/
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|