The effect of apertureModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The effect of apertureHere are 4 shots of the same dragonfly (Australian emerald, Hemicordulia australiae) but with different f/stops. The smaller the f/stop, the larger the aperture (hole through which the light passes), the more out of focus the background becomes. This is because depth of field (the distance of the scene in front of and behind the point of focus which appears to be sharp) is related to the f/stop. Smaller f/stops mean larger apertures and smaller depth of field.
f/16 f/8 f/5.6 f/4 Last edited by ATJ on Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: The effect of apertureNice tutorial Andrew
And a nice shot of the dragonfly as well 7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
Re: The effect of aperture great stuff!!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: The effect of aperture
can we clarify that for some of our more impressionable readers..... The smaller the "f-stop number" the more out of focus the background becomes. A small f-Stop number like f2.8 actually makes for a large aperture opening and this creates the small depth of field (hence out of focus backgrounds) A large f-stop number like f22 means the aperture is closed down to a small size and this creates in large depth of field so that more of the image appears in focus.
Re: The effect of aperture
Which means there's a big hole through which the light may pass.
Which means there's a small hole through which the light may pass. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: The effect of apertureI have added further detail in the description.
Re: The effect of apertureGood series of shots. Shows how DOF decreases as the size of the aperture increases.
The trick I'm trying to learn is to balance DOF with Bokeh when in Macro mode. It sounds a bit like Lawn Bowls. On a 'Fast' green your bowl takes around 17 seconds to cover 27m. On a 'Slow' green your bowl takes around 10 seconds to cover 27m. Go figure.
Re: The effect of apertureAndrew great reference
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Re: The effect of apertureGreat tute Andrew... May should be moved to the tutorial section?
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|