Photos with no light .....Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Photos with no light .....Well - I couldn't see anything !! Went out frogging last night, and hiked down to the waterfall lookout at O'Reilly's (Lamington NP) at about 9.30pm by headlamp - never been there before so was wondering what it actually looked like (you can't see much in the bush at night, and there was a fair bit of cloud cover), so set up the camera at 6400iso for 30 seconds - shot blind and balanced the camera on the hand rail (after I saw what the cliff looked like from the other side I think that may have been a bit foolish LOL) - anyway, it turns out that this is the view Not great shots I know - but bear in mind how they were taken (Sorry I haven't been online for ages - bloody Opt-ass)
First shot (no idea how close to the cliff we really were) Shot from the other side - we were actually at the top of the cliff about 80metres from where the waterfall drops... Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Re: Photos with no light .....Rel, I like the first shot. It is a bit dark, but considering how you took it, it doesn't seem all that dark. I can see a lot of noise in the second one and there also appears to be movement (camera shake?) in the background. You'll just have to go back and try this again with a tripod.
Re: Photos with no light .....i like the second one, maybe the foilage moves in the breeze created by the waterfall.
Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Re: Photos with no light .....thanks for the feedback guys - I think I should probably have put this some where else ??? I know they are crappy shots - I was just amazed at what was picked up to be honest - we didn't even know what was there - it was just point, hit the shutter and wait. There would have been quite a bit of movement - there was some pretty good gusts of wind and a camera sitting on a railing isn't too steady.... lol ..... back to frogs for me
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|