Bathing CharlieModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Bathing CharlieToday was a scorcher down here in Melbourne. Charlie was feeling the heat so I offered him a bath. Unfortunately my flash batteries were low so I only got to fire off a half dozen before they died. Trying to get as much use out of it before I have to return it to its rightful owner
Please C&C... He's one of my favourite subjects, but can be incredibly difficult to capture. This is him mid-splash This is him post-splash PS - I know pet pictures are generally scoffed at, but I couldn't resist these ones I am not very confident with post-processing, so please feel free to edit and repost.
Nikon D80 * 18-200VR * 50/1.8 * Nikon FTn * 50/2.0 70-210/4.5-5.6 * 90-230/4.5 * 200/3.5 * 135/2.8
Re: Bathing CharlieWhile these appear to be snap shots, I'd say these suffer from distracting background elements and would next time try to remove or compose the shot to avoid detracting from the main subject, who's cute. I'm not sure if its my uncalibrated screen but these look a too warm to me, could just be the brick and red plate, but I'd get someone with calibrated screen to give their opinion on if the WB is where is should be at.
Re: Bathing CharlieA great subject with a big 'cute' factor. On my monitor the images appear to be too dark....I suspect they might be about 1 or 2 stops under exposed which would explain why they look a little muddy. This would also explain the slight colour shift. It may have been your flash not working properly?
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Bathing CharlieI think if my cats saw these they would complain that their dinner is undercooked!
Great concept though. Ant. D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|