Macro

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Macro

Postby J.Davis on Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:45 pm

Two of about fifty, boy this macro stuff is hard.
Image

Image
Regards
John
Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8.
Benro A650, SB600.
User avatar
J.Davis
Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:12 am
Location: Willowbank Qld

Re: Macro

Postby Marvin on Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:57 am

Man, I agree. Macro is a lot harder than you would think it is! What did you use for the second one? I think that the first would be better with more focus on the ant, perhaps getting closer (again, easier said than done) or a crop.
Nikon D7000
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.

Re: Macro

Postby MATT on Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:15 pm

Yep it is , but you are off to a great start..

I find it easier to manual focus to as close as possible, then rock in and out to get the final adjustment. Then fire when the time is right..

I quite like the second image, keep posting

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Re: Macro

Postby J.Davis on Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:00 am

The water drop was the flickmixer in the kitchen sink. I placed a piece of patterned paper behind it and lit it with onboard SB600, all in manual, to try and get some shutter speed in the shot.
Regards
John
Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8.
Benro A650, SB600.
User avatar
J.Davis
Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:12 am
Location: Willowbank Qld

Re: Macro

Postby FrankieP on Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:44 pm

Did you use your Tamron 90mm for these? (It's one I'm seriously thinking of - great to see some shots by it!) I like the composition of the ant one, I don't mind that it's not cropped tighter around the ant as it looks large like one of our meatants out here until you realise the amount of stamens surrounding it, and that in fact it must be rather small compared to the flower's centre, so it adds context. Is the focus *just* slightly in front of the ant?

I really like that you've used the patterned paper is a great idea as it adds to the shape of the droplet - otherwise it might have looked quite hard and solid, like mercury perhaps, but the pattern shows it's curves gives it depth and something to look upon too. Did you take any without the paper? Would love to see more shots!
Have: Nikon D90.. Nikkor AF-S 18-200mm VRII, Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.4G, Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Tokina AT-X 116 11-16mm f/2.8, Tokina AT-X M100 100mm f/2.8 Macro.. Manfrotto 732CY & 484RC2, SB-600, Think Tank gear..
Next: Nikkor AF 35mm f/1.8G, Sigma EM-140 DG Ring Flash..
User avatar
FrankieP
Member
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:51 pm
Location: Charleville, SW Qld outback, slightly west of the middle of nowhere..

Re: Macro

Postby J.Davis on Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:23 pm

They where taken with the 90mm -hand held. I did take some water shots without a backdrop but they lacked definition in my opinion, so out they went.
Regards
John
Nikon D7000,Sigma 10-20, Sigma 24-70 F2.8, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Nikkor 50 F1.8, Nikkor 85 1.8.
Benro A650, SB600.
User avatar
J.Davis
Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:12 am
Location: Willowbank Qld


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques