low light seascapes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

low light seascapes

Postby robert on Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:12 pm

At Caloundra a couple of weeks ago

I know the first two are very similar in composition but cant decide which I like better..
click for larger

Image

Image

Image

Image

Thanks
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Re: low light seascapes

Postby biggerry on Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:53 am

My pick would be #3. #2 needs the horizon straightened.

I do find myself coming back to #1, mainy to imagine what else there is there, maybe a landscape shot might help here....not sure.

#4 would look great with a pano style crop.

There are some very nice tones in these pictures - curse all you people with nice sunrises :twisted: ....not a cloud in the sky.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: low light seascapes

Postby gstark on Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:09 am

biggerry wrote:#2 needs the horizon straightened.


That's the curvature of the Earth, Gerry. :)


Robert,

Of the first 2, I prefer #2. For me, the lower angle of view with the rocks on the rh side provide an anchor to the image. The higher angle on the first image seem to provide a leading line into the image, but without the benefit of the anchor point.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: low light seascapes

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:04 pm

Really love the soft tones on #1 :)

Great work :)
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques