Multi shot macro 1st attemptModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Multi shot macro 1st attemptHi,
I have just purchased a set of micro positioning rails so had to try them out - the aim is to improve DOF when working really close 1:1 standard macro 5.6 Multi shot composite (helicon focus) OK so now I'm sufficiently encouraged from this 1st attempt that I'm off to find a decent subject. Any quick hints on this technique always appreciated (as shot 5.6 40D 100m macro manfrotto rails 50c propped up on piece of cardboard in light tent natural window light ) DebT 100m Macro, canon , DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
Re: Multi shot macro 1st attemptDeb good result, the only thing is the subjects have to be still long enough - good hunting!!!!
Canon
Re: Multi shot macro 1st attemptA few pins will hold them steady
Re: Multi shot macro 1st attemptHi Deb
I've never used Helicon focus but I've done it manually using layers in Photoshop. Your method will work fine with a subject such as you illustrate because you have a continuous range of focus. I don't think any automated system can cope well with a discontinuous range of focus. For example, you might have a leaf in front of a flower and other leaves behind - and you want them all in focus. The problem here is where the flower is in focus the near leaf will be out of focus and the out of focus leaf will be larger than an in-focus leaf from an exposure when the flower is in focus. In such a case there will always be an unfocussed area at the boundaries between the leaf and the flower. You then have to get into manual methods of adjustment (such as very careful and painstaking cloning) or simply avoid images with discontinuous focus. Mind you, if your only objective is to display for the web, the problem may be somewhat less acute because your image needs much less detail. Regards, Murray
Re: Multi shot macro 1st attemptWow that looks really good, can't really tell there was any editing at all on the coin.... but the background on the edited one looks a bit odd, was the background really like that or are they artefacts from the software?
Re: Multi shot macro 1st attemptNice Deb.
Neo, I think most of what you are seeing is the pattern in the cloth used. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Multi shot macro 1st attemptHi,
the background was a very creased piece of white ripstock nylon (a cheap light tent) but the software didn't handle it particularily well as it was much closedr to the first shot. I generally use nicer fabrics like velvet but this was a very quick attempt and I couldn't be bothered getting it out and ironing it . DebT DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
Re: Multi shot macro 1st attemptI don't think it's to do with ironing. While you can see the pattern in the cloth that is only revealed through an exposure more distant in focus than the top image, there are several horizontal bands behind the coin towards the bottom and the top that look very much like artifacts to me. I think it's probably because the software requires 8-bit Jpegs and while it's not that impressive for a continuous background (I'm talking about the software here), more exposures might help.
Regards, Murray
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|