Faces of MelbourneModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Faces of MelbourneTested out the 180 2.8 ED today. It's a corker of a lens and nice and compact. Loving it!
Last edited by PiroStitch on Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:10 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Faces of MelbourneEach photo .. is so similar ... very clean and simple .. a nice small red 'X'
Re: Faces of MelbourneWayne,
Very nice images, with good subject isolation in the first three as well. Were you sampling, or have you acquired, the lens? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Faces of MelbourneThanks Gary.
I've acquired the lens. Was surprised at how small it was. It's not as loud as a 70-200, metaphorically speaking. The only thing about the lens is the need to take extra care when swapping lenses around as it doesn't have a rear element protecting the shutter blades. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Faces of MelbourneI can only see the red X's
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: Faces of MelbourneI can only see red X's too???
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
Re: Faces of Melbourne
I've got blue question marks...... (mac) But still no photos. Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
Re: Faces of MelbourneNot sure why Picasa doesn't want to play ball. I've updated with text links as well to the direct photo.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Faces of MelbourneLinks don't work for me either... It looks like Picasa has hotlinking disabled... If I cut-paste the links into my browser, then I see the images...
Some good street photography there... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Re: Faces of MelbourneFinally figured out how to fix it!
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Faces of MelbourneHey I re-checked them and can see the pics. Good street photos!
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|