Gig Photography Part - 1Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Gig Photography Part - 1Hey All,
It's been a while since I've actively posted any shots for review and critique, mostly because I've been flat out at work and just in life in general. I have squeezed some much needed photography in, and I've actually been trying something new for me which is low light (bad light) gig photography. These shots are from Mountains Band called Playjerise a personal favourite, these were taken at their new album launch. I shot using the 24-70 2.8 and D700, and really pushed the ISO up there to get the shots. Gallery can be found here
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1Nice mate. Good to see the D700 performing well in such low light. I havent tried mine yet in such extreme conditions, so your images are a good indicator. Can I ask why you limited yourself to a 2.8 lens? Limited room to move? I wonder how it would 1.4 or 1.8 would go on it?
I really like the B&W conversions, they have a timeless feel to them. All gig shots should be like this, could be taken this week or 40 years ago in a bar in Liverpool. Nice work! 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1On this particular occasion I had the 24-70 for reach early in the night, the headline band came one and I was stuck at the very front, good place to be, but my gear was at the back with Katie.
Another Gig I shot just recently brought the bag with me to the front, and tried, D700 with 50 1.4, 24-70 2.8 and also with a gelled SB-800 on a SC-29. I'll post a few from that night in part 2.
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1The black and whites are great, have that magazine feel about them..
Canon
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1Craig also a fan of your B&W here
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1I absolutely love that first image! Did you shoot it in b+w or was it a pp conversion?
"The rarest thing in the world is a woman who is pleased with photographs of herself" - Elizabeth Metcalf
Food blog - Kitchen Wench Personal blog - The Kitchen Wench Diaries Flickr - Insanity Theory
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1Love gig shots and these have a nice feel to them.
Cheers, Paul
A bit of Nikon gear.....some more would always be nice!
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1Not having shot gigs, but having shot orchestras I understand the great difficulty such photography presents to the photographer. Have not looked at your gallery yet (have to go to work!!), but these shots are very well done. B&W conversions are very nicely done and quite effective. The first colour shot (the two singers) has some blown highlights (mainly off the guitar and the rear guitar players pants) and although to me they distract a bit from the image I know there is not much that can be done about them and it still is an effective shot. The only other comment to make is that all four photos are from the same side of the stage. It sounds like you could not move around much, but, if covering an "event" a bit of variety in the shots never goes astray.
Never could use a flash with an orchestra and had to use the stage lighting and white balance was always a challenge (never mind the fact that the players wore black as well and the music was white so nailing the exposure for them was a real PITA!!!!) Well done, and looking forward to Pt 2. Mark P. Canon 60D, 50 1.8, 24-105L IS, 100-400L IS, Sigma 10-20mm etc
I'd put something witty here, but I just can't think of anything....
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1Great shots mate. Particularly like the 1st and 3rd. You've really captured the vibe.
I usually don't do this sort of thing, but I photographed a gig last week also. It was very difficult, so I can appreciate what you've done here. Will post up some pics soon also. It's almost as if the lighting guy deliberately works against you.
Re: Gig Photography Part - 1
They do. And ususally, the sound guy is a frustrated guitarist with little knowledge of what the concept of "balanced sound" might mean. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|