Old technologyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Old technologyI saw yesterday Rachael Archibald's winning picture in Qweekend's and decided to do my own version.
What do you think? PS. Unfortunalely, Qweekend hasn't published on its website Rachael's picture yet so I cannot provide you with a link.
Re: Old technologyNice image! Personally probably prefer the needle and writing a touch sharper but without a macro that may be hard. I am envious of your stereo, the GFC has meant I can't update!
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Re: Old technologyLovely stuff! Great colour scheme.
I would prefer more emphasis on the needle and writing (more exposure as well as sharpness)
Re: Old technologyThanks for your comments. As you would have realised, the record and the pickup (needle and the arm) are moving. To get the effect of a sense of movement and enough depth of field, I had to use a low speed and a higher aperture and the combination of these and the available low light caused the needle to be a bit blurred, which is what I was after. I didn't want to freeze the movement.
Re: Old technology
Got ya. In that case, I suppose there are two options. Blur the disc not the pin or both (as you have done). Maybe a bit more blur in that case may be interesting to see?
Re: Old technologyI think that the needle needs to be sharp.
In this case, I'm not sure that the needle actually needs to be placed on the disc; would it be obvious if it were held suspended a millimetre or three above the record's surface? I don't really know if that would work, but I suspect that it's certainly worth trying. This is a great image, well executed, with a wonderful feel to it. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Old technologyThank you all again. I will try another shot during the weekend to see if I can make the needle sharper.
Re: Old technologyThis is a variation on a theme trying to get the needle sharper. Taken at night with artificial light. What do you think?
And Black and White: Last edited by zafra52 on Sun May 17, 2009 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Old technologyThis was taken yesterday at midday with more ambient light and it is closer to the first. Unfortunately, the server was down and I couldn't post it.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|