Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by aim54x on Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:50 am
i was out and about again tonight, so i thought I would share a few more pics: I thought i would have another crack at HDR...what do you all think? (Photomatix then Noise Ninja)  I revisited that tunnel, I quite like the stars that are forming from the streetlights  I quite like this one, not sure why though  just playing with the 50mm (two stops under to achieve this, being properly exposed resulted in a strange 'normal' look) 
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:46 am
The HDR doesn't do much for me in this case, but I love the last one, the line of lamps and the corresponding pools of light beneath them is very cool!
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by gstark on Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:15 am
I think the HDR might have benefited from a slightly higher PoV. I don't like how the coathanger is bisected by the fence.
Craig's comments regarding the last one are spot on.
I'd like to have seen HDR treatment on the third one; the exposure under the bridge is good, but the lights etc in the background are a bit too bright, and pulling them down would make this a better image, I think.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22923
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by tntman on Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:39 am
I like the last one too! If only there was a bride and groom or a couple kissing each other under one of the lights.. that would make a perfect wedding photo... 
Current Gear - 1D MKIII body, 5D MKII body, 17-40mm F4 L, Canon 70-200 IS F2.8, Sigma 120-400 OC HSM, 580EXII, 430EX II, 430EX. Panasonic G1 twin lens kit (My fav digicam!)
-
tntman
- Member
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 9:11 pm
- Location: Parramatta, NSW
by aim54x on Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Thanks for the comments everyone.
I didnt think to bracket the 3rd shot, but I do have the RAW so I may just create a few extra exposures and HDR away with it. I have to admit that I have only been playing with HDR for a few shots (this is I think the 3rd time) so there is much to learn.
I quite like how the fence in #1 has turned out, it is a shame that it has cut the bridge.....*doh!*
Thanks for looking guys!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by gstark on Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:29 pm
aim54x wrote:I quite like how the fence in #1 has turned out, it is a shame that it has cut the bridge.....*doh!*
Exactly. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22923
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by surenj on Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:47 pm
Cameron I still quite like the bridge shot. I do agree with Gary about the perspective. aim54x wrote:I didnt think to bracket the 3rd shot, but I do have the RAW so I may just create a few extra exposures and HDR away with it. I have to admit that I have only been playing with HDR for a few shots (this is I think the 3rd time) so there is much to learn.
You may find that it's harder to HDR this if you have underexposed it to start off with. You might cause the wrath of the noise gods. I would be keen to see the result however.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by aim54x on Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:30 pm
surenj wrote:Cameron I still quite like the bridge shot. I do agree with Gary about the perspective. aim54x wrote:I didnt think to bracket the 3rd shot, but I do have the RAW so I may just create a few extra exposures and HDR away with it. I have to admit that I have only been playing with HDR for a few shots (this is I think the 3rd time) so there is much to learn.
You may find that it's harder to HDR this if you have underexposed it to start off with. You might cause the wrath of the noise gods. I would be keen to see the result however.
Well I guess I will have to give NoiseNinja a whirl over it (I have a bunch of software goodies at the moment). Lets see if 14-bit raw is worth its memory cost! I'll probably get to this tonight, I dont have the gear here, nor the files.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|