3 Quicky B & Ws

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby stubbsy on Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:21 pm

I'm finally working my way through the Pyrmont/Anzac bridge shots from last weekend and these 3 seemed best as black and whites. Each is quite a different shot, so I'd be interested in your views in if they work as b & Ws. All were processed using Nik Silver Efex Pro.

Click an image to see it larger. Thanks for looking.

Image


Image


Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby Murray Foote on Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:25 pm

I like number 3 (which must be with a fisheye).

There's an opportunity to add in someone walking out of a half- open doorway....

Regards,
Murray
User avatar
Murray Foote
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
Location: Ainslie, Canberra

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby big pix on Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:15 pm

3 good B&W images..... the 3rd image is just fantastic..... :lol:
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby Wink on Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:23 pm

#3 looks awesome!
Adam.
MY PHOTOS
Allows Image Editing
User avatar
Wink
Senior Member
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:23 pm
Location: Seymour, VIC

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby biggerry on Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:44 pm

They are 3 great images Peter! The last is exceptional, I spent so long trying get all that in 17mm, the use of the fisheye there was a perfect choice, that also has to be the closest to symmetry as your gonna get from that bridge position!

The more I look at #3 the more I like it, the composition of the image reminds me of a insect (bear with me here!) the plyons are the body and the cables the wings - that image would look awesome as a desktop background!

Whilst the second image may look simple and plain enough, to look at that building and compose those lines is quite an achievement in my opinion, I just walked by that one :| was there any distortion correct on this one?

In terms of BW conversions, I think they all work well, however I would be interested in seeing that third one as a colour version, in particular with a nice blue sky...?!
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby aim54x on Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:27 pm

Very nice work... I have to admit that #3 is absolutely stunning!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby jaff on Mon Aug 17, 2009 1:01 am

Love #3 the perspectives are amazing, it took me a second to work them out!
jaff
Member
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: Stirling South Australia

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby DebT on Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:18 am

Great job - love #3 but would you be able the color shot so I can work out where/what it is
DebT
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby Greg B on Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:59 am

Geez, I thought there were going to be three B&W (and hence artistic, not tawdry) shots of Stubbsy having a quicky
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Instead, just more of his excellent photographs.

All great Peter, #2 has a real sixties feel to it. Love them all.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby zafra52 on Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:14 pm

I think the first one might even work better in sepia; while the last one would be more interesting in colour. The second in an interesting study in human made pattern so it is goos as is.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby colin_12 on Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:43 pm

Go the fish eye shot. Love that bridge effort Peter.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby craig.rohse on Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:31 pm

Going with the flow...................the 3rd one is very nice. Its like your looking down on earth from the international space station. :? ( hmmm, maybe I should stay away from the cookies) :)
"Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
User avatar
craig.rohse
Member
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:16 am
Location: Austins Ferry, Hobart

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby Killakoala on Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:36 pm

The first and the last are appealing but I find the second one a bit boring and clichéd, even though it is good in B&W.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby stubbsy on Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:05 am

Thanks for all the comments. I've yet to choose the colour images (I have maybe 30 different fisheye images with different angles), but here is #3 in colour immediately prior to the B & W conversion. Note that it's not necessarily my final colour PP on the image since I'm a perfectionist and this was done to make a good B & W rather than a good colour image.

I'm still not sure if I prefer the B & W or the colour although I'm leaning toards the b & W as being starker and a little more compelling.

Image


biggerry wrote:Whilst the second image may look simple and plain enough, to look at that building and compose those lines is quite an achievement in my opinion, I just walked by that one :| was there any distortion correct on this one?

Gerry - that one is as composed - taken with my 28-70 f2.8.

craig.rohse wrote:Its like your looking down on earth from the international space station. :?

Craig - I see space station in this one too hence the caption I used on the B & W.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: 3 Quicky B & Ws

Postby Geoff on Tue Aug 18, 2009 9:01 am

All good Peter, but the third image (in B&W) is outstanding!!!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques