Our feathered friendsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Our feathered friendsAnother afternoon watching these guys have a ball..
Love the bokeh on this one, was lucky that the gull was close and provided good separation between it and the water Feasting away Take off Afternoon landing Canon
Re: Our feathered friends
yeah that is pretty premo! I also like the inclusion of the little bit of food or scrap that he/she has dropped in the lower right! I also liek the pelican takeoff shot, its astounding to see these things get off the water . My only suggestion with this one would be a bit of extra room on the left hand side so the bird is in teh centre? gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Our feathered friendsGreat shots... love the last pelican landing shot
Re: Our feathered friends
(this is gonna get academic.. ) how so? As I see this image the eye of the bird intersects the top left 'power point' (interesection of the third lines), which in my opinion, in this case, would better intersecting the main subject - the whole bird (since eye contact is probably not super critical at this distance). So how are you intrepreting the rule of thirds? Now, if one was to move the bird to the right and intersect the body with the top right 'power point' you would (still?) 'obey' the rule of thirds and also 'obey' the rule of having space in front of the moving subject Note: I am not having a dig at you - more trying to understand, so if I am missing the bleeding obvious bear with me gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Our feathered friends
Well, if we want to be picky, one might say that the bird is currently in the "wrong" third, and perhaps needs to be further to the right as we're viewing the image, so that it has "room" to move within the image frame. Alternately, Matt might chime in with his classic advice. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Our feathered friendsI agree with you that the eye of the bird is in the third at the left and top, which is why I have framed it like this. When watching this take off, the water which is left behind was of more interest to me than where the bird was going. I do not have much to play with as this is basically how it was shot but will have another look and see if I can use one of the other frames in the sequence to see if it does make a difference.
Canon
Our feathered friends
Fair eniugh, and in which case, perhaps a slightly wider angle - something giving a less tight crop - may have been helpful. Cheers g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|