Almost swept away at Long reef

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby surenj on Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:56 pm

Thanks to Gerry a bunch of us turned up at Long reef at an early hour. :cheers:

I learnt a few things about the waves. Main learning point was to respect them; alot. I did have some great troubles timing the waves as I had lost my remote. :roll:

Here are a few of my favourites for your critique. They SOOC (apart from LR adjustments on laptop monitor) as I am away from home. I haven't had a closer look at my brackets for HDRs yet.

Thanks to everyone for making it fun! Definitely needs to be repeated. :wink: I love having so many hours to the day after waking up so early!

As usual for your critique.[I seem to learn everytime you comment!]

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by surenj on Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby stubbsy on Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:11 pm

Surenj

#2 - I like the composition, but I'd like to see it a bit less overexposed.

#4 - While it's very purple/magenta I think this one works well (a touch cooler might be an improvement - hard to say). I like the dreamy quality it has.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby aim54x on Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:21 pm

Considering you were having a morning to forget you have come back with some nice stuff!

#1 has plenty going on and it just leads you into the sun
#2 dial back the exposure a bit and I think you have a winner!
#3 missing something, it has nice foreground, nice leading lines...that lead you into blank
#4 I like it, a bit mysterious as Peter said, but works well
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby Remorhaz on Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:57 pm

I really like #2 - I only wish it wasn't blown out in the middle and just had nice reflective water - I'm not sure how yo found nice still water like that - I was looking for it all over without success :(
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby biggerry on Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:23 pm

surenj wrote: I did have some great troubles timing the waves as I had lost my remote. :roll:


pppffftt... :rotfl2:

The second image is a winner here in my eyes, hopefully you can recover those highlights since it does come across over exposed, the composition here is good and the simple, still refelection will always be a winner! Its a shame the clouds and the pinks did not come to the party, but none the less you have done well with what was available.

The first one is nice but since the water movement and flow is the primary subject it (imo) needs to be defined and provide a solid foundation for the eye to follow, here its a bit mashed up leaving my eyes lost in the image - the horizons a bit off too.

The third one is nice, you had a good possie there, you had more balls than me to crouch over there - the position has paid off and hopefully you can recover the exposure to bring that brightness down.

#4 the water is running out of the image 'cause its crooked - comments from #3 appy to this one too :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby photomarcs on Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:56 am

wow the first looks like you've capture a space shot of the earth in the water. :up:
Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing.
Don't be so negative!
http://www.photomarcs.com
User avatar
photomarcs
Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney Australia

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby Jenno on Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:57 am

Good leading line in the first but I'd be inclined to lighten it a bit on the LHS
#2 looks a little cold :D yeah I know it was but I'd be inclined to warn it up a bit.
Good composition in 3
Number 4 might work better as a pano crop
User avatar
Jenno
Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: The Hills District Sydney

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby biggerry on Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:18 pm

photomarcs wrote:wow the first looks like you've capture a space shot of the earth in the water. :up:


I want whatever your having :?: :!: :wink:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby aim54x on Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:37 pm

biggerry wrote:
photomarcs wrote:wow the first looks like you've capture a space shot of the earth in the water. :up:


I want whatever your having :?: :!: :wink:


I'll have some too!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Almost swept away at Long reef

Postby surenj on Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:08 pm

Thanks everyone for their input.

stubbsy wrote:I like the dreamy quality it has.

Thanks Peter. I have 4 different versions of this. I couldn't decide which one is best. I may have to post all 4 for everyone to have a look... :roll:

stubbsy wrote:I'd like to see it a bit less overexposed.

aim54x wrote:#2 dial back the exposure a bit and I think you have a winner!

Remorhaz wrote:I only wish it wasn't blown out in the middle and just had nice reflective water
biggerry wrote:hopefully you can recover those highlights

Thanks boys. I am chuffed to say that all highlights can be recovered! [Besides I bracketed this one so should be all good :wink: ]

Remorhaz wrote:I'm not sure how yo found nice still water like that

It was to the left of the reef that you guys were hanging out on. A little bit of wading was required I think. :wink:

biggerry wrote:The first one is nice but since the water movement and flow is the primary subject it (imo) needs to be defined and provide a solid foundation for the eye to follow

Do you mean you'd prefer more definition in the waves? [For this I will also do HDR as I have two more brackets with plenty of shadow info]

biggerry wrote:#4 the water is running out of the image 'cause its crooked

I can't seem to get these level in lightroom no matter how hard I try.... :oops:

aim54x wrote:
photomarcs wrote:wow the first looks like you've capture a space shot of the earth in the water.
biggerry wrote: I want whatever your having
I'll have some too!

Dude, What the??? and yes, I'd have some too... Maybe we should have all had some BEFORE the shoot. :twisted:

Jenno wrote:Good leading line in the first but I'd be inclined to lighten it a bit on the LHS
#2 looks a little cold yeah I know it was but I'd be inclined to warn it up a bit.
Good composition in 3
Number 4 might work better as a pano crop

Thanks Ray. Now that I am home, I can work at these with my monitor etc. #2 will be HDRed and #4 DOES look better as a pano! I took about 15% off top and bottom!
Good to meet you at last!
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques