Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Remorhaz on Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:17 pm
Very enjoyable morning lads - great to catch up with you guys - thanks Gerry for organising once again... Again no GND - however not even one HDR today (they were turning out horrible - I even tried the HDR Pro thingy in Photoshop this time). I discovered the gradient filter thingy in Lightroom so had a bit of a play and got much better results just adjusting the single RAW exposure - so not even any multi layer photoshop jobs today. Comments please  Firsly Way Pre Dawn - this is that 3 minute exposure I took looking back towards the City - so the ambient light in the sky is coming from the main city. I didn't have my remote so this is a three minute hand hold the shutter button - not ideal but it appears to have basically worked... D90 + Sigma 8-16mm : 177 sec at f/11, ISO 200, 16mm  Pre Dawn D90 + Sigma 8-16mm : 6 sec at f/13, ISO 200, 8mm  D90 + Sigma 8-16mm : 2 sec at f/13, ISO 200, 12mm  D90 + Sigma 8-16mm : 1/13 sec at f/16, ISO 200, 13mm  Looking Back: D90 + Sigma 8-16mm : 1/25 sec at f/16, ISO 200, 12mm  D90 + Nikon 18-200mm : 1/80 sec at f/9, ISO 200, 31mm  My Pano action (single ultra wide shot cropped) D90 + Sigma 8-16mm : 1/200 sec at f/11, ISO 200, 8mm  Alas no Pelican photos 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by Jenno on Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:04 pm
You are lucky not to have been thumped for exceeding the 4 image limit Was'nt sure how #1 would turn when I saw you setting up for this shot but it turned out quite different to what I thought it would. Like the first light the headland. Shame those big goolies in the Pearson shots arnt anywhere to be seen  Be a bit inclined to shave a bit more off the bottom It's interesting to compare your last pano with Gerrys. Your lens can sure squeeze heaps more in
-

Jenno
- Member
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:15 pm
- Location: The Hills District Sydney
by biggerry on Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:09 pm
I think we should refer to that 8-16mm bad boy as the pano lens or the one shot wonder  I like the last thre images, the third last works very well since you have picked out some nice lines running across the image, works very well here... The second last I also like, but left me wanting to see more on both the left and right sides..this possie would be a good candidate for a 3 shot pano. The exposure is also very nice, you have nailed it here, just enough movement in teh water and the sky looks exactly like what it did on teh day... The pano is also nice, the first few don't really ring my bell...
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:49 pm
Good work with the #1. It's got a nice gradation of cool to warm which you should accentuate. I vaguely considered a long exposure here but didn't fancy holding down my thumb on the shutter for several minutes only to find a blurry image. #3 has good composition and wave action. You could selectively sharpen the waves to define them more.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by aim54x on Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:25 pm
Those pano crops are working really well for you! Loving the colours and the motion you have captured. I hope that D90 is feeling better now
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by surenj on Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:21 pm
You know what, #1 is one of the few images that capture the unique vista specific to Long reef. I reckon we all need to return sometime.. 
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by Remorhaz on Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:41 pm
aim54x wrote:Those pano crops are working really well for you! Loving the colours and the motion you have captured. I hope that D90 is feeling better now
Yep I setup some 6x2, 5x2 and 4x2 resize things in Lightroom to use and found these 4x2 crops worked pretty well with these particular images. D90 appears to have survived thanks  - I went out shooting flowers with my daughters yesterday lunchtime and appeared to work fine - fingers crossed 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by surenj on Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:00 pm
Remorhaz wrote:D90 appears to have survived thanks - I went out shooting flowers with my daughters yesterday lunchtime and appeared to work fine - fingers crossed  Nice. I had a job cleaning my filters. They had salt drops on them. 
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by zafra52 on Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:07 pm
I like all photographs, but #3 is the winner for me.
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4855
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by aim54x on Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:50 pm
Remorhaz wrote:aim54x wrote:Those pano crops are working really well for you! Loving the colours and the motion you have captured. I hope that D90 is feeling better now
Yep I setup some 6x2, 5x2 and 4x2 resize things in Lightroom to use and found these 4x2 crops worked pretty well with these particular images. D90 appears to have survived thanks  - I went out shooting flowers with my daughters yesterday lunchtime and appeared to work fine - fingers crossed 
Good to hear that your D90 has survived!! On the topic of Pano cropping, I tend to free crop until I am satisfied...but that makes printing intersting
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by surenj on Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:04 pm
As a side note, #3 appears to have some magenta casting that I get with some of my filters. Apparently this is some IR phenomena. You didn't use any filters did you? [Or did you change the hues in post?? ]
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by Remorhaz on Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:00 pm
surenj wrote:As a side note, #3 appears to have some magenta casting that I get with some of my filters. Apparently this is some IR phenomena. You didn't use any filters did you? [Or did you change the hues in post?? ]
No Filters but I did warm this up in post (I'm not sure if thats the correct term for what I did - when I'm in front of my Mac and Lightroom I'll have a look at what sliders I moved  ) - the sea and spray had a very blue tinge in the original.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|