40 minutes after sunset ...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

40 minutes after sunset ...

Postby surenj on Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:54 pm

I visited the usual spot today and missed the golden rays of the sun by about 5 minutes. There were some good clouds but the color had completely washed out.

There was a pelican on the jetty which didn't run away when I approached so I thought I'd do a few silhouttes etc. 40 minutes (or more!) after the sun had set, the colors began to reappear about 60 degrees to the left where the sun had set.

Single shot :wink: and I tried a different composition (by this time even the Pelican had left)

I have heard that the best colors can be seen before a sunrise and after a sunset, but this is the first time I have noticed a medicore sunset showing quite an improvement.

For your critique as usual. Thanks for looking.

Image
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: 40 minutes after sunset ...

Postby biggerry on Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:02 pm

Nice, I am liking this one alot Suren, it is probably the best of all your squids ink images. As always I reckon a pano crop (a fraction off the bottom and more off the top) would work well, however I am pano obsessed ... :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: 40 minutes after sunset ...

Postby gstark on Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:09 pm

biggerry wrote:I reckon a pano crop (a fraction off the bottom and more off the top) would work well,


yep, absolutely. That was my initial thought as well.

however I am pano obsessed


But I am not.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: 40 minutes after sunset ...

Postby surenj on Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:41 am

Thanks Gerry and Gary.

I have attempted the suggested crop and it looks significantly better. One of the reasons that I posted here was that I had a queasy unbalanced feeling about this and didn't know how to improve it.

I can of course return and retry with a different composition. I am kicking myself that I didn't go any closer on this day.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: 40 minutes after sunset ...

Postby aim54x on Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:02 am

A very good looking image!!

I agree about the pano crop suggestion as well. This viewpoint of the jetty works a lot better than the last set.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: 40 minutes after sunset ...

Postby biggerry on Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:09 am

On a side note Suren, you have nailed the sharpness in this image - it looks very nice sharp and at that size avoids teh forum resize issue.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: 40 minutes after sunset ...

Postby Wigspotter on Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:42 pm

Really nice image.

If you wanted to reduce the amount of crop as requested above, you could edit out the shiny plate in the middle of the jetty. It's quite distracting. Then maybe a small crop at the bottom and off the right and you're there.

My 2c.

C
Wigspotter
Newbie
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:07 pm
Location: Inner West, Sydney, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques