An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8I am probably using this lens all wrong since I'm still not used to the very shallow DOF @ 2.8, but personally when I take shots like this one I feel I need to have that little chat with the Chief Financial Officer (aka my wife). I currently have a very good mate who lets me borrow his lens whenever I need it for a shoot (bless him), but it is powerfully addictive.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8yep, there is no doubt about it, the 24-70 is a premo lens, I am in teh same basket as you, have borrowed and unfortunately realised what a gem it is - its also a really great focal length on the DX system!
nice picture, love it how the background just melts away. Shame she is not smiling, was she in trouble gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8I'm lucky enough to own a copy....it is a beautiful lens...if you can get the ok to grab one then you will probably never leave home without it.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
I'm almost embarrassed when I use it, because it doesn't actually seem to need me at all. I feel like it just shoves me aside and takes over. Personally (not being a professional), I'm usually happy with my blue collar 18-200 VR 3.5/5.6, which typically behaves very well in my amateur judgment (here and here), but using the 24-70/2.8 again yesterday (not this shot), had me running to the 'For sale' section of this forum today (and lo and behold, I find a couple of them for sale). For the kind of work I usually do (kindy shots), it's perfect.
Thanks. It's crazy what this lens does to the background at 2.8, so soft and creamy. She wasn't in trouble, she's just typically serious, and usually looks like that (a surprisingly grave little bub, and I'm always delighted when I can get her to laugh).
I will incorporate this into my argument, 'All the other boys have one!'.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
I am not sure if "all the other boys have one!" is a valid argument....but "it is perfect for my work" is! Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
I am prepared to sacrifice validity for rhetorical force. Unfortunately my photography is a mere hobby, not work.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
ahh, thats a very grey area and one that is not so hard to convince the other half of... try this, 'so darling, i been thinking' (it might all go pear shaped with that bit, but trust me if you get past it its all good..maybe.) 'I have been meaning to try and get into this photography stuff, you know maybe take some semi pro portraits of teh friends kids and stuff' ' but i need to get this lens to help me out' 'its doesnt cost much'... 'truly'... 'cmon honey, it make ya look good too' doh, you'll be sleeping in the doghouse for weeks with that... on the other hand...just don't tell her... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8If you take out $50 every 2 weeks from your account and out and put it under your mattress, you will be able to buy the lens in about 2 years. No one will need to know where you got the money.
Just make sure you make the bed and there is nothing else underneath your mattress.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8Looks like you are using the lens extremly well - really love the expression ... suggest you stay friends with the owner then offer him a fair price for his second hand
DebT DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
Now that is some very smart lateral thinking! Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
I doubt the value of this lens would decrease much though. Good thought however. I would still put those $50 away each week or so. You are going to need lots of it...
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
Thanks, I appreciate it. Actually you have given me a very good idea. When he lent it to me last Saturday, he apologized that the zoom ring is actually very stiff these days, as a result of a couple of unfortunate falls. He has had the lens for a couple of years, and it has traveled internationally a few times, so that's probably to be expected. The glass on the other hand is absolutely flawless, and the AFS is perfect (I cannot get over the speed). I found that the zoom lens does stick when you wind it out from around 40mm onwards, but once you're aware of it there's no real issue (you just make sure you put plenty of wrist into the action). Reviewing this photo from Saturday (pretty raw, needs a white balance and exposure tweak), I may seriously make him an offer so he can either replace his with a new lens, or upgrade (if that's even possible from this lens).
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
The 24-70 IS is just around the corner. OR that's what he rumor sites have me believing.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
Aha, that makes sense.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
what IS around the corner is a long wait Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8Cameron,
Do you have access to a better source?
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8Well my friend is hardly going to be interested in a Canon lens anyway.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8Probably one of the reasons why I went for the Sigma 24-70 f2.8 over the Nikon - the price was, and still is, crazy!
I couldn't tell much difference between the two, apart from the Nikon being slightly faster AF in low light, but not $1000 worth!
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
Now you have me thinking the way my wife wants me thinking. I hear the non-HSM version has a noisier and slower motor which irritates some 'togs, but it's probably no louder and slower than my 18-200/3.5-5.6.
Re: An argument in favour of the 24-70/2.8
and how many other times have this lens been rumoured??? If it is here in August then it is here.... Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|