Pulling BackModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Pulling BackI have a dilemma. I find the Sydney Opera House a tantalising mistress - everyone has had her yet she tempts me still
Last Saturday was no exception and the three images below all appeal to me. Trouble is I can't decide whether up close or pulled back a little makes for a stronger image. That's where you guys come in - tell me what image is the most compelling for you (or are all 3 just crap) Opera-House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> Opera-House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> Opera-House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Pulling BackAll three look good to me Peter, but the composition of 1 & 3 in particular seems to work well... Well done... You did well to find something not commonly seen.
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Re: Pulling BackHi Peter,
I personally prefer the third. Displaying strong lines of the 'Mistress' together with depth of the over hang of the high pitch shell. Looks like you are mastering the D700 fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
Re: Pulling BackInteresting shots Peter, al very similiar compositions and the ones that stands out, and only by a nose, is #1, there is a definite feel of patterns and juxtaposed lines (man.. I have sooo wanted to use that word for sooo long now ) and I feel this is more prevalent in the first then the others.
All the images seem to have some banding in teh blue sky, or is that just my end?
I could say something...but I had better not gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Pulling Backi'll never get tired of shooting the opera house
the first image is the best by far because 1. It has alot of architectural element dimensions, the sweeping sails, the windows, the staircase and the foundation all of these things you have framed with skill in 1 image 2. The angle it is taken at shows artistic flair and lots of thought. It also portrays the subject differently and it's not obvious that its the opera house. 3. the crop is great because unlike the 2nd image you have cropped out the metal bar at the right side that is out of place and destroys the synergy between all the elements All i would do is desaturate the blue sky so its more like a darker grey blue to make it look more dramatic, the tone of the sky looks too vibrant and sort of unreal the 3rd image is good but somehow the centering of the subject doesn't fondle the mind Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Re: Pulling BackNo 1 stands out for me. The straightish lines of the bottom section reflect stability and the curve of the top reflects creativity. Nicely done. Sky is also beautiful. Might be interesting in B&W.
Peter Mc Nikon & Olympus
Re: Pulling Back
Wendell beat me to it. It is obviously architectural but unless you know the opera house it can keep you guessing. Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Pulling BackPeter
Both #1 and #2 work very well. The composition in #3 is a little weak because of the white mass on the bottom left hand corner. It weakens the image by dragging the eye down to that point. Regards
Matt. K
Re: Pulling BackI prefer #1. It could be any building, but it's the SOH from a unique angle. Very different and very nice.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Pulling BackAnother different point of view! I like!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Pulling BackPeter,
For me it's #1. Hands down. First of all, it's somewhat misleading, as it almost looks like it could be a bridge of some sort, but it's also one that passes muster as something that EnergyPolice would approve of, as clearly, there's been little that you've done in post to achieve this outcome. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Pulling BackI have to agree with #1. I like 1 and 3 as a set though, you look at 1, wonder what it is, look at 3 and then the penny drops!
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
Re: Pulling BackPeter this may not help but I prefer #1 and #3. Would hedge toward #1 more though.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Pulling BackThank you all for your comments.
I noticed that too Gerry. It's in the jpeg versions, but not the original. Nothing I could do could eliminate it so I gave up.
Well I did straighten it a little, but I think I'd pass muster with this one. I've taken the advice on board and slightly reworked #1 to lighten and slightly desaturate the sky. Here's the result (it's also a slightly wider crop). As seems to be the consensus my preference is for #1 and then #3. Opera-House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|