First try at Macro

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

First try at Macro

Postby sully on Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:32 pm

Here are my first shots at macro photography, it's great fun, and I think this will take up a fair bit of my time for a while as it's great fun...

Image

some of you might notice the blue tinge above, I only realised afterwards that I shot this with the computer screen behind the flower :oops: oh well, these were really just 'playing with the new toy shots', next time...

Image

Any guesses as to the flower?
User avatar
sully
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:32 pm
Location: Mitcham, Melbourne

Re: First try at Macro

Postby surenj on Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:57 pm

Hi Sully,

No idea about the flower.. but I am sure someone will identify it!

This looks slightly fuzzy on my screen. :idea: Could I suggest that you use even higher apertures like f22 etc next time to increase your DOF. You may want to try manual focus as well.

I didn't know that the 24 105 could focus close like this.

Keep em coming. :cheers:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: First try at Macro

Postby sully on Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:04 pm

Hehe magic tricks :) (a macro filter that goes on the end of the lens - about $30. not bad for a bit of fun) they are a bit blurry, particularly the second... but it was my first try! I do know the flower, I work with them, just curious as to whether anyone else knows them... How is the composition etc?
User avatar
sully
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:32 pm
Location: Mitcham, Melbourne

Re: First try at Macro

Postby aim54x on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:10 am

Not bad for a $30 filter....now try to borrow a proper macro lens (Tamron 90mm, Canon 100L) and compare :twisted:
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: First try at Macro

Postby gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:20 am

For a first effort: excellent.

And yes, a lot of fun.

What aperture were these shot at? Do you know where the sweet spot of lens is?

As Cameron has suggested, something like the Tamron 90mm might be an excellent choice for you: it's inexpensive, and bloody good.

Also, perhaps look into getting some extension tubes. Again, an inexpensive option, but a great way to get you learn and shoot more.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: First try at Macro

Postby Mr Darcy on Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:45 am

I'll vote for a Protea of some kind. Possibly the king.

A very good first attempt. but stop down more if you can. Use a flash to add more light if you need it. This will give you greater depth of field. Also put the camera on a tripod if you haven't already.

I second the suggestion of Tubes. This can be as simple as a toilet roll sticky-taped between the camera and lens, but I recommend the Kenko tubes for greater ease of use. You can also place one lens, reversed, in front of another to give you some amazing magnification. The results you get will depend on the lenses. Some combinations are brilliant, some don't work at all. Suck 'em and see.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: First try at Macro

Postby pennylane1284 on Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:59 pm

I agree with all of the people here. It's a pretty good first attempt, but I think that you can make your focus a bit sharper.
Last edited by gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Removed unauthorised (spamming/SEO) signature line
pennylane1284
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:16 pm

Re: First try at Macro

Postby sully on Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:57 pm

aim54x wrote:Not bad for a $30 filter....now try to borrow a proper macro lens (Tamron 90mm, Canon 100L) and compare :twisted:


But if I do that, i'll want to buy one!

Mr Darcy wrote:I'll vote for a Protea of some kind. Possibly the king.

I second the suggestion of Tubes. This can be as simple as a toilet roll sticky-taped between the camera and lens, but I recommend the Kenko tubes for greater ease of use. You can also place one lens, reversed, in front of another to give you some amazing magnification. The results you get will depend on the lenses. Some combinations are brilliant, some don't work at all. Suck 'em and see.


Close, but no cigar... The King has a huge flower, if you cup your hands together in a bowl shape, that's how big they are, roughly (if you have big hands). This is a Leucodendron, part of the same family as Proteas but quite different in a lot of ways. this flower is about 2 inches wide.

I have extension tubes, but hate using them because I cannot change the aperature with them as they contain no circuitry. A toilet roll certainly does not have this function!

gstark wrote:For a first effort: excellent.

And yes, a lot of fun.

What aperture were these shot at? Do you know where the sweet spot of lens is?


These were shot at f9 and f11 respectively, I will try a few different options when I have some time later tonight
Thanks all for the feedback :)

Josh
User avatar
sully
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:32 pm
Location: Mitcham, Melbourne

Re: First try at Macro

Postby aim54x on Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:58 pm

sully wrote:
aim54x wrote:Not bad for a $30 filter....now try to borrow a proper macro lens (Tamron 90mm, Canon 100L) and compare :twisted:


But if I do that, i'll want to buy one!


I know.... :twisted:

Mr Darcy wrote:I second the suggestion of Tubes. This can be as simple as a toilet roll sticky-taped between the camera and lens, but I recommend the Kenko tubes for greater ease of use. You can also place one lens, reversed, in front of another to give you some amazing magnification. The results you get will depend on the lenses. Some combinations are brilliant, some don't work at all. Suck 'em and see.


I have extension tubes, but hate using them because I cannot change the aperature with them as they contain no circuitry. A toilet roll certainly does not have this function!


The Kenko tubes fix this problem...they have circuitry to allow for aperture control and even AF (not 100% on IS, but I suspect so as well)
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: First try at Macro

Postby gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:41 pm

aim54x wrote: and even AF


But for macro photography, AF is probably less important, verging on unnecessary.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: First try at Macro

Postby Mr Darcy on Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:19 pm

aim54x wrote:
Mr Darcy wrote:I second the suggestion of Tubes. This can be as simple as a toilet roll sticky-taped between the camera and lens, but I recommend the Kenko tubes for greater ease of use. You can also place one lens, reversed, in front of another to give you some amazing magnification. The results you get will depend on the lenses. Some combinations are brilliant, some don't work at all. Suck 'em and see.

sully wrote:I have extension tubes, but hate using them because I cannot change the aperature with them as they contain no circuitry. A toilet roll certainly does not have this function!


The Kenko tubes fix this problem...they have circuitry to allow for aperture control and even AF (not 100% on IS, but I suspect so as well)


Yes they also preserve IS (well VR anyway. who can say with Canon :twisted: ) But like AF, there is not really any point with macro photography.

You didn't mention you had manual tubes. If there is no connection, they work on minimum aperture. You probably want to be there anyway (or close to it!) in order to get maximum Depth of Field. You probably want really bright continuous light though so you can focus successfully.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: First try at Macro

Postby aim54x on Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:34 pm

Mr Darcy wrote:Yes they also preserve IS (well VR anyway. who can say with Canon :twisted: ) But like AF, there is not really any point with macro photography.

You didn't mention you had manual tubes. If there is no connection, they work on minimum aperture. You probably want to be there anyway (or close to it!) in order to get maximum Depth of Field. You probably want really bright continuous light though so you can focus successfully.


My thoughts exactly about the "IS". AF and IS/VR is not great for macro, but people ask for it (I will get at least one person a week complaining that AF in a macro lens is not fast enough - when used for macro, and at least someone saying "AWESOME" to IS/VR on the 100L (which is meant to be usable with IS as a macro) and 105VR (which is not recommended to use with VR)).
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: First try at Macro

Postby sully on Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:34 pm

Mr Darcy wrote:
You didn't mention you had manual tubes. If there is no connection, they work on minimum aperture. You probably want to be there anyway (or close to it!) in order to get maximum Depth of Field. You probably want really bright continuous light though so you can focus successfully.


I am suprised, I thought they would stay wide open, as a lens would be before you take a photo so as to let maximum light through the viewfinder. How does this change with and extension tube?
User avatar
sully
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:32 pm
Location: Mitcham, Melbourne

Re: First try at Macro

Postby aim54x on Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:40 pm

sully wrote:
Mr Darcy wrote:
You didn't mention you had manual tubes. If there is no connection, they work on minimum aperture. You probably want to be there anyway (or close to it!) in order to get maximum Depth of Field. You probably want really bright continuous light though so you can focus successfully.


I am suprised, I thought they would stay wide open, as a lens would be before you take a photo so as to let maximum light through the viewfinder. How does this change with and extension tube?


I think your correct Sully (for Canon lenses), but Greg is a Nikon user (like myself) and by default, the Nikkor lenses without aperture rings (G lenses) have their apertures in the closed down state until you install it on the camera body.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: First try at Macro

Postby zafra52 on Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:47 pm

Number one is the winner here.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: First try at Macro

Postby sully on Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:24 am

aim54x wrote:I think your correct Sully (for Canon lenses), but Greg is a Nikon user (like myself) and by default, the Nikkor lenses without aperture rings (G lenses) have their apertures in the closed down state until you install it on the camera body.


If anyone is interested, I have found a solution for canon lenses, fire up the camera with the lens installed normally, select your desired aperature, hold down the DOF preview button while removing the lens and the aperature will stay in that position until installed next time, so you can now reverse your canon lens, or use manual extension rings.

Josh
User avatar
sully
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:32 pm
Location: Mitcham, Melbourne

Re: First try at Macro

Postby aim54x on Wed Sep 08, 2010 3:17 pm

sully wrote:
aim54x wrote:I think your correct Sully (for Canon lenses), but Greg is a Nikon user (like myself) and by default, the Nikkor lenses without aperture rings (G lenses) have their apertures in the closed down state until you install it on the camera body.


If anyone is interested, I have found a solution for canon lenses, fire up the camera with the lens installed normally, select your desired aperature, hold down the DOF preview button while removing the lens and the aperature will stay in that position until installed next time, so you can now reverse your canon lens, or use manual extension rings.

Josh


Thanks Josh I will try to remember that one
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques