Fisheye VisionModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Fisheye VisionIt has been awhile since I have dragged out the Tokina 10-17 fisheye, but over the long weekend I did manage a few
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Fisheye VisionI like the tunnel shot Cameron but it would be better if your mate was moving/walking
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Fisheye Vision
I'll try that next time...may want to bring my tripod for that one though! Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Fisheye VisionThe fisheye gives a great look. Like 1 and 2, think 3 would be a bit better if the rhs of the stadium roof was not cut off. I imagine you could not get back far enough to capture all of the roof.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Fisheye VisionI also like the tunnel...has this been defished? (or as Apple predictive text would suggest "fetishes"?)
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Fisheye VisionNice curves in all these cameron - doing the fisheye justice with that!
I agree about teh stadium shot, needed to be a fraction wider I reckon. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Fisheye Vision
Yep...that 10mm Fisheye just wasnt wide enough for the Stadium....I was in a corporate box and I just couldnt get wide enough.
Actually, the answer is no....I quite liked what happened with this image, the slight curvature could be the tunnel roof, or the lens... you decide!
Thanks Gerry....It is such a pleasure to use, especially out at night when it gives you these distinctive six-pointed stars Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|