Story Bridge for C&CModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Story Bridge for C&CHi all,
Took these the night I was in Brissie a few weeks back. Would love to get some feedback. Thanks 7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
Re: Story Bridge for C&CIm drawn to the brighter exposure in the first image but it doesnt look quite as sharp as the second. How long was the exposure? Did you use a remote release on your tripod?
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: Story Bridge for C&CMy humble thoughts...
#2 is much sharper than #1 for me and whilst the image is very nice I think it could be better somehow. Perhaps you need to see more of the bridge to the left and right rather than chopping it off in the middle of the arc (or perhaps more square cropping the image at the vertical pillars to force the viewers attention to the middle - the buildings, the reflections, etc). I think the composition in #3 has potential with the mirror of the bridge in the water but perhaps needs to be even further to the back and left so the bridge sort of extends from closer at the start on the left to more into the distance on the right. That white boat on the left could prove to be an unwelcome distraction however. D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Story Bridge for C&CI think you had the venues right but missed out on the timing.
These images are better (IMHO) if there is still some light in the sky, rather than completely black. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Story Bridge for C&C#2 for me, although the dark area bottom right is a distraction, perhaps a crop to remove it and making it even more of a pano might work. Not seeing both ends of the bridge is also a let down, do you have some images you could stich together?
Twilight would also be a better time of day to give a bit of a lift. Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Story Bridge for C&CThanks guys - appreciate the comments.
You're right about the timing - had drinks with the boys so only got away after dark. There were some other angles - I'll have a look and see if any are better. Thanks again for the feedback 7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|