DSLRUsers.com

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.

Skip to content

Vivid 2012

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Write comments

Vivid 2012

Postby aim54x on Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:22 pm

I think the general consensus this year was that we were all Vivid-ed out from the last few years. Sadly, it seems like the organisers have worked this out and this year was even less of a photographer's haven.

Thinking laterally
Image

Chimping
Image

Image

Image
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney
Top

Re: Vivid 2012

Postby stubbsy on Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:07 pm

Cameron

Of these #1 is the standout. And inspired :-)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
Top

Re: Vivid 2012

Postby aim54x on Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:32 pm

stubbsy wrote:Cameron

Of these #1 is the standout. And inspired :-)


Thanks Stubbsy, this is that Tamron 17mm f/3.5 in action....the one that turns stars into F111's
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney
Top

Re: Vivid 2012

Postby Mr Darcy on Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:13 pm

aim54x wrote:the one that turns stars into F111's

To be fair to it, I did try a few other subjects and it was fine to my eye. The stars just showed up a flaw. Or maybe Steffen was right & I didn't have the focus right. After all I did manage to leave the lens cap on for about 100 photos so I clearly wasn't firing on all cylinders that night.Sadly I haven't seen stars since so I haven't been able to retry it. PS I agree about #1. I think Vivid is more and more about video rather than still photography
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
Top

Re: Vivid 2012

Postby aim54x on Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:11 am

Mr Darcy wrote:I think Vivid is more and more about video rather than still photography


It certainly feels like it has become very much a visual experience that it heavy on animation....and definitely a lot less photo friendly
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney
Top

Re: Vivid 2012

Postby zafra52 on Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:01 pm

Yes, I prefer the lines too...
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane
Top

Re: Vivid 2012

Postby chrisk on Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:29 pm

aim54x wrote:I think the general consensus this year was that we were all Vivid-ed out from the last few years. Sadly, it seems like the organisers have worked this out and this year was even less of a photographer's haven.

Thinking laterally
Image


sensational !!! :up:
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
Top
Write comments

Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Copyright © 2005 - 2022 Gary Stark


Portal XL 5.0 ~ Plain 0.2