The Murray at Echuca

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The Murray at Echuca

Postby TonyT on Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:43 am

The mighty Murray river did not look that mighty as it was very low

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by TonyT on Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:19 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT

Re: The Murray at Echuca

Postby Mr Darcy on Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:12 am

#1 It think a lower POV would have been better. You would get all the reflection & cut out most of that blown sky.

#2 & #3 seem to be the same image Perhaps brighten the shadows a tad.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: The Murray at Echuca

Postby zafra52 on Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:18 pm

I agree with the above comments.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: The Murray at Echuca

Postby TonyT on Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:24 am

yer I agree about the first one this was taken on the first day and I had just walked down to the river to have a look and there she was. The others were taken the next day at a lower point and yer 2 and 3 oops.
User avatar
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques