Macro - no stackingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Macro - no stackingSome macros snapped whilst roaming around Ku Ring Gai Nat Park. Without a flash, and using the 105VR hand held I felt severely limited with the amount DOF I could achieve.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Macro - no stackingLooking good Cam. I like the second best for the simplicity, just a shame the main subject flower was not filing the frame a little more.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Macro - no stackingI am with Geoff here, the second is nice, i would like to see it a bit lighter and if you are gonna crop it, i would crop it such that the flower is off centre, that however, is just a preference thing. That flower and composition is one that is suited to limited DOF.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Macro - no stackingI want to like the first but not quite there for me. I actually like the third the best.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Macro - no stacking
#1 I really would like a different DOF. Perhaps more or perhaps just have that bud in the centre in full focus #2 would benefit from croppage. Perhaps a square format #3 is my pick but I think it has been oversharpened to put "focus" in where it wasn't in the first place. That central open flower has a distinctly fuzzy outline caused, I think, by sharpening to the point of noise being brought out. Then a mask has been applied to cut the noise back, resulting in those fuzzy edges. I recognise it because I have a nasty habit of doing the same thing Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Macro - no stackingThanks guys!
Actually that is pretty much straight out of camera (converted from NEF to JPG via CNX2), I wish I had spent the time doing what you have described, my D300 usually has its in camera sharpening slightly higher then normal so this is showing through in the conversion. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|