Hunter Valley in ColourModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hunter Valley in ColourI got my slides back today. Unfortunately, I had slightly overexposed and lost some of the golden colour. That said, I am not too dissatisfied with them.
Interested in comments viz the B&W ones recently posted. I think this shows that the slides have significantly less dynamic range than the B&W film as seen in the shadows of the first one. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Hunter Valley in ColourI think the first works in terms of colour and the less dynamic range and blown sky help give it a light and airy feeling - I think the image (colour version) definitely needs to be cropped, the really dark shadow areas create too much of a jarring transition within the frame conflicting with the light and airy feeling. I think using that dark area as a border/frame to the main part of image would work heaps better imo - ie crop from the bottom and right only.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Hunter Valley in ColourI am with Gerry, the first image does really well with the addition of colour!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Hunter Valley in Colour
+1 for me too D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Hunter Valley in Colour
I think you are right, Gerry - the shadows dominate too much and wreck the mood of the image. However, I cropped it this way because of the way the chair was facing. I may try some work on the shadows in a semi-HDR fashion. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|