Australian wildlife with the 70-300G

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Australian wildlife with the 70-300G

Postby Geoff on Mon Apr 04, 2005 4:22 pm

It'd been a while since I posted, shot this a few months ago..he was enjoying the sun as was I :). Shot with the under-rated 70-300G :) Critique welcome.
Image
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Glen on Mon Apr 04, 2005 4:25 pm

No wonder everyone bags that lens :wink: Only joking, Geoff you and Killa do a great job showcasing the capabilities of that lens. Nice shot
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby dooda on Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:05 pm

We should change the name of the 70-300 g lens to "the underrated..." because everytime you guys post with it no one can believe it. Really sharp and good composition. I would like the background rock to be alittle darker so the lizard's head stands out more.

The interesting thing about this photo is, no matter where I'm standing in the room his eyes follow...what kind of witchcraft is this?
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby sheepie on Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:52 pm

Ahhh - but there is skill in making this lens sing :)

Not many of us possess this elusive skill - it is not something which can simply be learned, you must be born with it :wink:
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:58 pm

He doesn't look too happy about getting a mug shot taken :) Great detail!
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Apr 04, 2005 6:38 pm

Geoff - with shots like this there is no need for the 70-200VR in your arsenal. Like it matey :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Geoff on Mon Apr 04, 2005 6:46 pm

Thanx Chris :) It looks good on my new monitor too, I am very excited :)
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Oneputt on Mon Apr 04, 2005 7:01 pm

Geoff that is one sharp shot. Luv it :D
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby bago100 on Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:27 pm

Geoff
Excellent shot of a very misunderstood and wonderful creature!
Hand held or tripod?
I find I can't get really sharp hand helds with the 70-300. Too many nerves and caffeine
Cheers
Graham
User avatar
bago100
Senior Member
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Shanghai China until Feb 2010

Postby Matt. K on Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:31 pm

That shot sings! Lizard looks very crapped off about something. You weren't standing on his tail were you? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Geoff on Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:39 pm

bago100 wrote:Geoff
Excellent shot of a very misunderstood and wonderful creature!
Hand held or tripod?
I find I can't get really sharp hand helds with the 70-300. Too many nerves and caffeine
Cheers
Graham


Hehehe Graham, this shot was hand held indeed. I'd had a coffee this morning, maybe Nikon accidently made it VR with no badge? Hmm...70-300 for sub $200? I doubt it. Oh it's a very light lens too.

Geoff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby mudder on Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:10 pm

G'day,
Just goes to show it's the operator that makes the difference... :)

One question though, is it me or is the DOF very short and the lizards feet are soft??? Where you quite close meaning the DOF is narrow/short? I think the EXIF showed F6.3 @ 250mm? It takes me to ask the dumb questions but someone's gotta do it :lol:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Geoff on Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:19 pm

mudder wrote:G'day,
Just goes to show it's the operator that makes the difference... :)

One question though, is it me or is the DOF very short and the lizards feet are soft??? Where you quite close meaning the DOF is narrow/short? I think the EXIF showed F6.3 @ 250mm? It takes me to ask the dumb questions but someone's gotta do it :lol:


Hello Andy,
You are right, the DOF is short, but that was the intention, I focused purely on the lizards head/eyes only. Not a dumb question at all! :)


Geoff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:43 pm

Pretty good portrait, Geoff, especially considering that it's hand held with such shallow DOF. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques