More Macro shots.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

More Macro shots.

Postby pippin88 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:37 pm

Some shots I took this morning with my Sigma 105 macro:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


These two are actually different RAW conversions from the same image:

Image

Image

RawShooter Essentials AutoWB made the white petalled image, whereas the pink one is much closer to the original (minor tweaking)

Ignore the dreadfull colour / style of my gallery, I was tired when I set it up and you don't get a preview of the skins in the rather long and involved setup process. Anyone know of a good clean, decent looking skin for Gallery?

Comments appreciated.
Last edited by pippin88 on Thu May 05, 2005 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby Neeper on Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:09 pm

Awesome pics, I love the first one. Excellent. I think you just sold me this lens. :D
User avatar
Neeper
Member
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:20 pm

Nick - the first shot is a winner - great lens
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby MHD on Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:26 pm

nice pics...
but...
use a different skin for your gallery!!!!!!!!!
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Manta on Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:53 pm

 AAAAAAHHHHH!! MY EYES!!! MY BEAUTIFUL EYES!!!! :shock:

That blue is pretty damn vivid!

Back to the photos: Fantastic shots Pippin - interesting compositions too.
Thanks for posting.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby the foto fanatic on Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:54 pm

New forum name:
D70users.net (Incorporating Sigma-world)! :lol:
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby birddog114 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:58 pm

cricketfan wrote:New forum name:
D70users.net (Incorporating Sigma-world)! :lol:


So chairman of the Sigma club is Sihrc55
Who's Club's deputy and treasurer? :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby pippin88 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:01 pm

Birddog114 wrote:
cricketfan wrote:New forum name:
D70users.net (Incorporating Sigma-world)! :lol:


So chairman of the Sigma club is Sihrc55
Who's Club's deputy and treasurer? :lol:


I'll be treasurer if I can embezzle funds to buy more gear.

Thanks for the comments.

Getting my head around gallery now. Should be much less eye destroying now.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby gstark on Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:08 pm

WHile we own the domain name, the current visibility of D70Users.net is onlya transient thing, while we're finishing the transfer from there to here.

Or was it from here to there?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby MCWB on Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:09 pm

Birddog114 wrote:So chairman of the Sigma club is Sihrc55
Who's Club's deputy and treasurer? :lol:

Sigma club meeting Midnight-4am, then VR club starts? :lol:

Edit: forgot to say, nice shots Pippin88! I particularly like this one: http://images.imagineant.com/gallery/Ma ... 2223JPGweb :)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby birddog114 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:14 pm

MCWB wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:So chairman of the Sigma club is Sihrc55
Who's Club's deputy and treasurer? :lol:

Sigma club meeting Midnight-4am, then VR club starts? :lol:


Trent,
I have no authority to organize Sigma club meeting (Have to talk to Chairman) but definitely with VR Club, I'm in.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby leek on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:28 pm

Damn... just when I was settled on my next lens... you come along with these photos and make me doubt again :)

Great shots... I especially like the 4th one...

What sort of frog is that in the 5th & 6th shots? How small / big was it???
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:35 pm

Nice shots, but suggest you change the blue skin to mid-gray. It will make your colours look more accurate.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:59 pm

Chairman of the Sigma Club speaking - there is no way in the world that I would ever get up at 2am to do any macro work, let alone anything else. Hmmm that last statement might be incorrect :roll:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby pippin88 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:30 am

leek: No idea on the sort of frog. Small bugger, those shots are nearing 1:1, but not quite there. There was actually two frogs, the other a whiter shade of grey but the shots that included both of them were too obstructed by OOF stuff and too far away.

Looking a bit better Matt?

Anyone know the hex code for 18% grey (I presume that would net the best perception of colour)

Yeah stuff 2am, we should be after 12PM - well fed and with full sunlight.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:40 am

Looks better. Maybe even a little darker gray would enhance the colours a tad more. The frog fascinates me. I haven't see a frog in years. Where have they all gone?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:59 am

sirhc55 wrote:Chairman of the Sigma Club speaking - there is no way in the world that I would ever get up at 2am to do any macro work, let alone anything else. Hmmm that last statement might be incorrect :roll:


Chris, congrats on your Chairmanship! :D

They have little blue pills to help you with that other problem... :shock: :twisted:
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby pippin88 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:00 am

I've made it a touch darker. But only a touch, if you think it needs more, could you pick one from http://www.december.com/html/spec/color0.html please?

Frogs: Here at my Dad's, we've had a million tadpoles in the pond/lake. And a fair number came out as frogs. Not that many around at the moment though.
Recently Dad chucked a couple of turtles in, but they haven't been seen since.
Last edited by pippin88 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:01 am

Nice shots, Nick. I like the frog shots. They could use a little more DOF, though. Time to get out your Sigma approved macro tripod with focus rails.... :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby pippin88 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:20 am

KerryPierce wrote:Nice shots, Nick. I like the frog shots. They could use a little more DOF, though. Time to get out your Sigma approved macro tripod with focus rails.... :)

In time my friend, much time.

There was just a bit too much wind for my liking, so I was hesitant to go below 1/100s even though I was using a tripod - the little blokes were on leaves that moved a bit.

Current list - and this is not a real "I wish I had that (eg 70-200VR, D2x, totally new computer)" list:
Another 512mb Ram
200gig Hard Drive (Da-amn they have got cheap)
SB800 (Large DOF + High shutter speed for macro = win)

And none of those are going to come soon.

Anyone wanna buy some photos? :wink:
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:46 am

pippin88 wrote:There was just a bit too much wind for my liking, so I was hesitant to go below 1/100s even though I was using a tripod - the little blokes were on leaves that moved a bit.


What ISO were you running? FWIW, I don't hesitate to shoot at 1600 with the d70. Usually a spot meter and a +.3EV or a solid 0.0 EV exposure will minimize the noise very nicely, IME. Of course, on the dark colored frog, you'd prolly not want a +EV setting. Pardon if you're already doing that.... :?

Current list - and this is not a real "I wish I had that (eg 70-200VR, D2x, totally new computer)" list:
Another 512mb Ram
200gig Hard Drive (Da-amn they have got cheap)
SB800 (Large DOF + High shutter speed for macro = win)


The sb800 is the cat's meow. Of course, the computer upgrades are needed too. I've got over 300gigs on this machine, with well over 100gigs of photos... :lol:
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby pippin88 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:07 am

About EV: I have noticed that pretty much all my shots yesterday were a touch under exposed, and I bumped up EV in Raw by about 0.5 to 1.0.


I shoot ISO 200 99.9% of the time, I suppose I should venture into higher ISO's for some macro stuff.

ISO 400 would = half the amount of light needed right? (So either half the shutter speed or smaller aperture).

I can't wait for the days when ISO 3200 looks like ISO 200 does now.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:00 am

pippin88 wrote:ISO 400 would = half the amount of light needed right? (So either half the shutter speed or smaller aperture).

I can't wait for the days when ISO 3200 looks like ISO 200 does now.


Going up one step in ISO, from 200 to 400, is one full f/stop ( f/4 to f/5.6 ) or one full shutter speed setting ( 1/250 to 1/500 ), and equals doubling the light.

heh, I'd like to see the ISO 3200 miracle as well, but would go about 5 or 6 stops higher. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques