South Bank

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

South Bank

Postby Soulboy on Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:47 pm

Having been laid low the last week with a touch of food poisening - yesterday was the first opportunity to get out and about.

This was taken about 8pm last night (BST) from Hungerford Bridge looking across to the Royal Festival Hall on the right and St Pauls in the distance.
Taken with the kit lens, I'm begining to think a decent fast "landscape" lens might now be top priority if anyone has any suggestions.

Image
User avatar
Soulboy
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: London

Postby big pix on Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:51 pm

Sigma 12-24 a great piece of glass..........

bp
Edit: glad you are back on deck, the weather in London is getter warmer and the days longer
Last edited by big pix on Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:51 pm

Sorry to hear about your bug but a great photo of the Old Father Thames - it’s changed a lot since I left in ’73.

There are 2 lenses that are used by a few of our members - The Nikon 12-24mm DX and the Sigma 12-24mm - I’m one of the Sigma crowd and highly recommend it.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby birddog114 on Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:52 pm

Nikkor 20/2.8, Nikkor 28/1.4, Nikkor 35/1.4 AIS MF or the soon coming "Coke" 30/1.4 :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Soulboy on Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:36 pm

Thanks fellas,

Showing my inexperience here but is is there any advantage in a prime lens over the zoom and why would you choose one over the other?

(Birdy, what's the "Coke"? :oops: )
User avatar
Soulboy
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: London

Postby birddog114 on Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:51 pm

Soulboy wrote:Thanks fellas,

Showing my inexperience here but is is there any advantage in a prime lens over the zoom and why would you choose one over the other?

(Birdy, what's the "Coke"? :oops: )


The advantages of the zoom are fast or super fast lens (F1.4 - 2.0) No other zoom lenses have the wide open at 1.4., glasses are of course lot better and far off the zoom, small and compact and true wide angle lens even in lowlight.

The 12-24 lenses start at f.4 and are convenient in the range of 12-24, wider than the prime, even with the 14mm prime.

"Coke" is refer to Sigma
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby pippin88 on Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:50 pm

Birddy means "The advantages of the prime are fast or super fast lens"
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby Soulboy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:08 pm

Thanks for the advice guys, I've decided I'm going to make the 20mm/2.8 my first purchase.

The 28mm/1.4 would seem to be ideal for those evening time pictures, though I didn't realise I'd have to sell the house to get one. :)
User avatar
Soulboy
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: London

Postby birddog114 on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:11 pm

then sell your dog for a 20/2.8 :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Soulboy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:18 pm

Birddog114 wrote:then sell your dog for a 20/2.8 :lol:


She don't look too happy about the prospect Birdy :lol: :

Image
User avatar
Soulboy
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: London

Postby birddog114 on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:28 pm

Sorry, have you told her about my post :roll:
Yes, look sad she is, perhaps she thought she's more valued than the Nikkor 20/2.8 :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Soulboy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:32 pm

She's worth nothing less than a 70-200mm/2.8 VR in my book Birdy :wink:
User avatar
Soulboy
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: London

Postby stormygirl on Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:48 pm

Lovely London again! Now I'm really getting itchy feet!
User avatar
stormygirl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques