I hate birds

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

I hate birds

Postby marcus on Sun May 15, 2005 12:31 am

Yes it's now official.........I HATE BIRDS. Just can't seem to capture the goddamn things in focus/sharp like I have seen others do. I've got no excuses, I own a great 70-200VR lens but as hard as I try I just can't nail the buggers. Here's a coulpe of attempts from today: I must say that when I have attempted these shots lighting conditions were not good (could this be the problem or is it just me?)

Image

Image
I know nutzinc
User avatar
marcus
Member
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:19 pm
Location: Lilli Pilli Sydney Australia...D70...

Postby PiroStitch on Sun May 15, 2005 12:45 am

Did you use USM on the photos? I've had a look at the exif and 1/1250 seems fast enough :) Keep trying and don't give up ;)

Seagulls glide fairly slowly so try and prejudge their flightpath a bit. See how you go. Speak with Arthur, he seems to be the bird king at 300mm ;)
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby sirhc55 on Sun May 15, 2005 12:57 am

Lighting was perfect today - do you pan these shots?
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby marcus on Sun May 15, 2005 1:06 am

Piro, I think these are the originals. I did use USM later.........did'nt help that much.
Chris, yes panned.
I know nutzinc
User avatar
marcus
Member
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:19 pm
Location: Lilli Pilli Sydney Australia...D70...

Postby kipper on Sun May 15, 2005 9:35 am

Marcus, it's a very hard task capturing birds, especially in flight. Then again some of the birds that I've been trying to capture over the past few months have been a pain to try and capture as they don't sit still for more than 5 seconds. Patience is the key, and you will be rewarded. As PiroStitch said 1/1250 is fast enough, your technique might be off when panning. Speak to Arthur, he seems to like capturing seagulls. They're not my cup of tea :)
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby sirhc55 on Sun May 15, 2005 10:49 am

Marcus - I would say it is your panning technique. The second pic is showing too much detail for a fast pan (unless, of course, the bird was stalling) :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby kipper on Sun May 15, 2005 10:54 am

Chris, given the angle of the birds wings I'd say the bird is probably heading into wind about to turn. Slow turn!
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Sun May 15, 2005 10:10 pm

Hi Marcus,

Getting the 70 - 200 VR doesn't necc solve the problem. If you want to freeze and capture the bird in flight in sharp focus, you are going to need 4 things:-

1. shutter speed at 1/1000 or faster. Preferably 1/2000.

2. need to shoot in good sunlight. early morning light is best.

3. the sun should be behind you so that the lights will adequate light up whole bird including the below the wings.

4. aniticipate the direction of the bird's flight path.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Neeper on Mon May 16, 2005 6:04 am

Are you using AF-C or AF-S? Bump up the ISO a little to use a faster shutter speed?
Johnny
D200, D70, 18-70mm, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 24-120mm VR, 12-24mm Tokina, 70-300mm Tamron, Lens Baby 2.0, Peleng Fisheye 8mm, SB800, Alien Bees Studio Setup: 1 B400, 2 B800, 1 B1600, Sekonic L-358
http://www.jtimagesonline.com
User avatar
Neeper
Member
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques